login  |  create an account

Category > Abortion

Resources about Abortion

 

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:

Share This Article

Written by Heather, an activist with the 1 in 3 Campaign. 

With the 38th anniversary of the Hyde Amendment here, allow me to dispel some myths using basic math. Here’s the myth: millennials and those born after Hyde was implemented are apathetic or are no longer doing the work to lift the health care coverage bans that deny abortion services to so many. Here are the facts: I, a 24-year-old born 14 years after Hyde, was among 180 abortion access advocates that participated in the All* Above All Hill Education Day during September 16-17. At a reception event the night before we were to take on the Hill those in attendance were asked “how many of us were born after the Hyde Amendment?” An overwhelming majority of the room, including myself, raised their hands not only to represent that we’re still here as a force doing this work but some of us are here as people who are still hindered by this harmful amendment.

In fact, 1 in 4 women or people with female assigned reproductive systems (FARS) that are of reproductive age are Medicaid recipients and 1 in 3 women or people will have an abortion in their lifetime. This puts a particular strain on low income people, people of color who are disproportionately low income, immigrants, incarcerated women and people, and youth who may also fall into some of the above categories. Earlier this year after a trip to the emergency room I had to apply for public funding to cover the remainder of my hefty medical bills. I would be denied this same funding in the event that I needed to access abortion services.

All of the above reasons are why I, like the rest of the 179 advocates, participated in this huge day of taking action. We were split up into teams that altogether met with 95 supportive Congressional offices, 13 of which were scheduled with members of Congress themselves, and represented over 25 states and the District of Columbia. Our message was delivered loud and clear regarding the absolute imperative to lift the bans on abortion and discuss the work that is already being put in place such as the most recent Be Bold Roadtrip. This campaign had the Bravemobile travel over 10,000 miles to 12 cities in 9 states to hold rallies and gather petitions that garnered support and raised awareness for this issue. We are going to continue to lay the ground work that it’s going to take to undo the 38 years of harmful Hyde. This is a legacy that has not and will not stop building.

To commemorate this work as a response to this 38th anniversary of the Hyde amendment the great news is that you don’t have to travel to Washington, DC but you can effect real change right where you live! Start by signing the  All* Above All declaration today. You can also apply to become a 1 in 3 campus chapter next year which is what I did to get involved in this awesome work! We’ve got to keep being brave, bold, and united in building the power that will insure reproductive health and access for all people.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
Hyde2014

No person should have their pregnancy options limited because they cannot afford to have an abortion. We have not fully secured abortion rights until everyone has access to safe, affordable abortion care.

That’s why we are part of All* Above All, a coalition of organizations committed to restoring public funding for abortion care.

Sign the All* Above All Declaration in support of repealing the Hyde Amendment.

Thirty-eight years ago today, the Hyde Amendment was passed for the first time, barring the use of federal funds to pay for abortion care. Every year, politicians in Congress renew the amendment and deny abortion coverage for individuals who get their insurance or health care through the federal government. Enough is enough!

We ask our members of Congress to affirm their support for the removal of all restrictions on coverage of abortion care, so that every person can make personal decisions that are best for their circumstances, without political interference.

Sign the Declaration – ask Congress to restore funding for abortion coverage!

Funding restrictions like the Hyde Amendment force one in four women insured through the Medicaid program to carry unintended pregnancies to term. And the proportion is even higher among younger women, who are less likely to have a steady source of income and more likely to be uninsured. The Hyde Amendment’s ban on using federal funds for abortion means that federal employees and their dependents, military families, people with disabilities, Native Americans who use the Indian Health Service, and many families on Medicaid all lack coverage for abortion care.

Join Advocates for Youth in signing the All* Above All Declaration in support of repealing the Hyde Amendment and restoring public insurance coverage of safe abortion care.

 

Tweet now!Tell Congress all women should be able to make their own decisions abt #abortion despite their income! http://ow.ly/C02uX #BeBoldEndHyde

 

tweet-now-toutEvery year, politicians in Congress deny abortion coverage to individuals who get their insurance or health care through the federal government. Tell Congress enough is enough! All women should be able to make their own decisions abt #abortion despite their income! http://ow.ly/C02uX #BeBoldEndHyde

Share This Article

Are you tired of politicians interfering in your personal health decisions? Fed up with the growing number of states that are making it ever more difficult to access abortion care?

Be Bold Road Trip

Yeah, so are we. That’s why were are linking up with All* Above All for their Be Bold Road Trip! This summer, All* Above All, a campaign to restore and sustain abortion coverage, is traveling around the country visiting 12 cities, 8 states and covering more than 10,000 miles to build nationwide support and call on Congress to stop denying critical abortion coverage and health care services to low-income women.

The #BraveMobile Kicks-Off Aug 9 in California. Can you join them? Know a friend that should? Click here to find a friend that should see the tour in their town.

Visit the #bravemobile to learn more about abortion coverage bans, sign a wall of support for lifting these restrictions, snap selfies, and hear abortion stories that bring the issues to life. Ultimately we want to send the message to politicians in Washington, DC, that we’ve had enough of them interfering in personal decision-making.

It’s time to for us to unite and lift the bans that deny abortion coverage to low income women. RSVP YOURSELF and a FRIEND for the BE BOLD TOUR.

 

Share This Article

The Supreme Court’s buffer zone decision has the potential to have adverse affects on the sexual health of youth. American youth already have higher rates of unintended pregnancies-despite the latest decline in rates, growing rates of sexually transmitted diseases, and receive misinformation about sexual health all the time (read abstinence only sex education in public schools). 

By not upholding the buffer zones outside of abortion clinics the Supreme Court just unanimously put youth in America at greater sexual health risk. 

The first time I went to a clinic for sexual health information and services was after I had my daughter. I was 16 or so and went to the only place I had hear about, Planned Parenthood. Thankfully I did not encounter protestors however, some of my friends had; they commented that they were afraid to go inside the clinic because of the angry mob outside so they left. 

While they were not there for abortion services the anti choice crowd outside caused so much fear to them that they did not go inside and speak to a sexual health professional about safer sex, free condoms, and or HIV and STI testing. 

They left. 
They knew of no where else to go and unfortunately one of their first attempts to make well informed sexual health decision for themselves was ruined by ill informed, intimidating, and aggressive anti-choicers. While they think they are “stopping” abortions from happening, they are actually stopping youth from making sexual health decisions and establishing healthy and responsible sexual health practices early on in life. 

The Supreme Court let us all down but youth just might be the most vulnerable population to feel and deal with the adverse effects this decision can have on our health.

Share This Article

It’s been a tough few days for us here at Advocates.  Last week the Supreme Court ruled against buffer zones at abortion clinics, and just a couple hours ago the Court put women’s access to contraception in jeopardy.

jepardy

We could give you a long, legal explanation of the cases, but in short—until our society recognizes that sexuality is a normal, healthy part of being human, we’ll continue to get devastating decisions like these.

Donate today so we can continue to fight for our personal freedoms and reproductive health services.

Shifting the culture around these issues is one of the most powerful tools we have as activists. Young people in communities around the world are already fighting for change. Help support them. Donate today.

We can do this.

Deb

Share This Article

ICAH 1 in 3 Gallery Display

 

Guest post by Lara Brooks

Lara S. Brooks is a Chicago-based youth worker fighting for transformative justice, queer and trans youth spaces, a never-ending supply of harm reduction options, and holistic health access for youth experiencing homelessness. Brooks works with the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health as a youth rights advocate.

During the first week of April 2014, youth leaders rallied at the Illinois state capitol to advocate for their reproductive rights and generate awareness about the dangers of the Parental Notification of Abortion Law (PNA). The Illinois PNA law requires that any person under 18 years of age seeking access to abortion services must have an adult family member (someone who is a parent, legal guardian, grandparent, or step-parent who lives with the young person) notified at least 48 hours before a medical provider can perform the abortion. There are similar laws in 38 states around the US.

As a long-time youth worker, sexual assault counselor, and former director of a youth center, I know that young people, navigating complex realities and complicated systems, are making informed and thoughtful decisions about their bodies—something that the very premise of PNA erases altogether. As an advocate and youth ally, I resist that erasure. At the recent youth rally in Springfield, I witnessed how powerful the voices and stories of youth can be when lifted up as part of policy conversations around the reproductive rights of youth.

The dangers of PNA, in combination with existing barriers to abortion access, disproportionately impacts youth who are in danger of or currently experiencing homelessness, housing instability, violence, and neglect. Based on my experiences working with young people, I know the trauma, danger, and crisis induced by PNA directly exacerbates violence, neglect, and homelessness. For already unstably housed young people, parental notification of abortion laws are just as dangerous as laws in other states that require written consent.

Most significantly, PNA does nothing to address the systemic or structural roots of this critical question: What are the lived realities of many young people in Illinois that make it unsafe to inform PNA’s list of approved adults and guardians in the first place?

I believe responding to the harms of PNA demands an intersectional, holistic response that includes all of us—young people, families, communities, youth workers, adult allies, healthcare providers, health educators, parents, and organizers. Despite barriers to comprehensive sexual health information and accessible healthcare, young people create powerful relationships within their communities, grow life-saving chosen families, and build critical, supportive and trusting relationships with extended family members, educators, youth workers, counselors, and other caring adults. Young people are actively striving to reduce their isolation in ways that are inspiring. As a youth worker, I witness this type of resilience every day.

The Reproductive Justice Movement that I want to be a part of builds its base by connecting and centering the real, lived experiences of young people. It connects to and learns from Environmental, Disability, Healing, and Health Justice Movements. It intersects with Racial, Queer and Trans* (transgender, gender variant, gender non-conforming, and gender questioning), Transformative Justice, and Economic Justice Movements. No one is disposable and solutions support both immediate and long-term goals and needs. For example, how are we holistically connecting struggles for reproductive health access with Trans* health access? How does Reproductive Justice intersect with state violence, policing, and discrimination? Which clients and patients are the most disposable in our current healthcare systems? How does a sex- and body-positive, gender-affirming, and trauma-informed health care system benefit all of us?

Structural and intersectional responses to reduce the harms of PNA, in this moment, include all of us.  Reproductive Justice pushes me to critically question and complicate definitions of self-determination, choice, and consent. And, at the same time, Reproductive Justice implores us to transform the conditions which may lead to increased violence for a young person seeking reproductive health options and abortion access.

I know we can do better and show up for young people by:

  1. Complicating narratives about consent and self-determination by creating spaces that allow young people to share their real lives in their own words.
  2. Listening to, trusting, and believing young people.
  3. Acknowledging that young people may be taking care of and supporting (emotionally, financially) the same family members that they are forced to inform when seeking abortion access.
  4. Increasing access to safe, gender-affirming, sex-positive, trauma-informed, and body-positive healthcare and health education.
  5. Creating alternative health-focused projects, organizations, and clinics with values in relationship building and harm reduction. Many of us feel a sense of disposability as staff, patients, and/or clients within health-focused organizations, medical institutions, and clinics.  Let us continue to build models that meet our needs and fight for our whole lives.
  6. Learning about legacies and histories of sexual and reproductive health resiliency.
  7. Educating our communities about ACLU’s Judicial Bypass Coordination Project, a strategy for reducing the harms of PNA right now.
  8. Centering the health priorities of Queer and Trans* young people of color, youth with disabilities, and undocumented youth in our reproductive justice and health access efforts.
  9. Taking part in efforts to end youth incarceration and the school-to-prison pipeline.
  10. Recognizing that laws like the PNA are an extension of the carceral state, one that values punishment-based systems and incarceration to “solve” community “problems” instead of restorative justice and community accountability practices. PNA may serve as a tool to discriminately punish young people most impacted by economic and housing injustices.
  11. Incorporating Healing and Disability Justice—and the ways our bodies have experienced intersecting forms of violence (institutional, state, individual, generational, and family violence) into our conversations, workshops, and writings about sexual health, abortion, intimacy, disabilities, youth incarceration, and more.
  12. Increasing opportunities for young people to access basic needs, including safer sex supplies, in accessible, non-judgmental spaces.
  13. Providing employment, educational, and authentic leadership development opportunities to young people—particularly young people of color, youth impacted by state systems like juvenile detention, foster care, and group homes, youth with disabilities, undocumented youth, and LGBTQ young people.

The Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health, ACLU of Illinois, and Chicago Abortion Fund are raising awareness with the support of Advocates for Youth in a campaign called #StopPNA. Follow the #StopPNA campaign on Twitter & Instagram where you can join in with your voice and stories.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

If you are anti-choice, this article is not for you. I am not writing to add to the plethora of content on the importance of reproductive rights. Rather, I am writing to ask more from the pro-choice community.

I’m pro-choice, but I would never have an abortion.

There was a time in my life when I had the audacity to make such a baseless statement. But then someone in my life, someone I respect and admire told me that they had had an abortion, and my adolescent naivety was shattered.

I’m pro-choice, but I would never have an abortion.

How many times have you heard this? Have you as well had the audacity to say it?

1 in 3 American women will have an abortion. Between 1973 and 2011, nearly 53 million legal abortions occurred in the U.S.

I’m pro-choice, but I would never have an abortion.

I’m sure most of the women who say that really believe it, and I’m sure many of them really would not ever have an abortion, but I’m also quite certain that no one can relate to the experiences of 50 million women.

I am in a supportive relationship, I have a supportive family, I attend a university supportive of mothers, and despite that context of support, if I were to become pregnant, I would still probably have an abortion.

Why is that so hard to say? Why does the abortion stigma remain within the pro-choice community? Or is it just in select communities that such caveats are necessary? Is it because I go to a Catholic school? Is it a desire to assimilate, a fear of acknowledging our womanhood, of owning our bodies? We take the fight out of our own feminism, acting as though the only feminism we need is “leaning in.”

Or is it an issue of validation? We fail to recognize our own needs as women and as members of a movement or activists in a field that has been historically undervalued in society. Our culture-bound norms of success and worth tell us that our human rights are merely “women’s issues” and we forget that our bodies and our autonomy are on the front lines.

Or is it the stigma? As students we juggle classes and internships and extracurricular, we do not make colossal “irresponsible” “mistakes” or “accidents.” We can say “I’d never have an abortion” because we can’t fathom that we’d ever have to make that choice.

I’m pro-choice, but I would never have an abortion.

Maybe you wouldn’t. Maybe, if you became pregnant tomorrow, you definitely would not have an abortion. But the context in which you would make that choice, whether to have an abortion or to carry the pregnancy to term, is unique, entirely distinct from the context in which over 50 million women have had to make that choice.

I’m pro-choice, but I would never have an abortion.

Regardless of the tone and the way in which you preface the statement, there remains the implication that there is something innately wrong with the decision to have an abortion. We need to stop treating abortion like a last resort right, and acknowledge that for many women facing an unintended pregnancy, abortion is a first resort. In saying “I would never have an abortion” we are telling women that abortion is acceptable, but that they should definitely avoid it at all costs, they should definitely feel guilty about it, or that getting abortion should be a lesson to be more responsible next time.

In conversations around sexual assault, we often encourage people to assume there is a survivor in the room. 1 in 4 college-aged women experience sexual assault, and thus, in any group setting, we should be cognizant of the impact of our words on survivors. I think we should assume the same with abortion.

If you knew that someone in your group project, on your team, on your dorm floor had had an abortion, would you say “I would never have an abortion,” aware of the judgment you are passing upon their decision? Would you knowingly reinforce norms about which type of women have abortions or the morality of the choice to have an abortion?

I’m pro-choice and I would probably have an abortion.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Thoughts at puberty”

Thoughts may come and go,
And minds made decisive,
Mates may stay to cuddle,
And tears cease to stop,

http://reverbednothesblog.wordpress.com/category/poetry-sex-ed/

Share This Article

I have seen people change and at the same vein witnessed a retrograde in youths. I have been around areas where there\’s no hope for light and peace, but in this same situation some people still survive.

I have been around youths – Boys and Girls, that have made life difficult for themselves due to lack of knowledge. And my countenance has dwindled, because I have witnessed a holocaust of ruined lives in the past, even now.

I love peace and the prospect it brings. I love sanctuary – a foundation laid on the rocks of simplicity and the Arm of Justice.
I stand against the illegal acts displayed by the so-called Governmental body. I stand against rape, child abuse and its associated acts. I stand against the malfunctioning of child rights and value – I stand for a change, as an \”Advocate\”.

I stand as a Youth, Not a man, alone. But with men – the colony of change.
\”A man cannot be a faculty, men can. The necessity of change begins with not one man, but with the uniformity of all\”.
(Victor Omovbude Brown)

I stand against – Child punishment, Tribalism, criticism, Discrimination, and Queer visions. I stand for change, which is my first goal. As a youth, I stand for Unity, Peace and Progress.

I stand for a free and transparent Health service attributed to (children,youths and adults) – I stand against unequal rights and segregation in roles.
I stand for Quality Education – Void of preferential treatment, equal for all.
I stand against poor governance.

I am an \”Advocate For Youth\”.

Share This Article

I have seen people change and at the same vein witnessed a retrograde in youths. I have been around areas where there’s no hope for light and peace, but in this same situation some people still survive.

I have been around youths – Boys and Girls, that have made life difficult for themselves due to lack of knowledge. And my countenance has dwindled, because I have witnessed a holocaust of ruined lives in the past, even now.

I love peace and the prospect it brings. I love sanctuary – a foundation laid on the rocks of simplicity and the Arm of Justice.
I stand against the illegal acts displayed by the so-called Governmental body. I stand against rape, child abuse and its associated acts. I stand against the malfunctioning of child rights and value – I stand for a change, as an “Advocate”.

I stand as a Youth, Not a man, alone. But with men – the colony of change.
“A man cannot be a faculty, men can. The necessity of change begins with not one man, but with the uniformity of all”.
(Victor Omovbude Brown)

I stand against – Child punishment, Tribalism, criticism, Discrimination, and Queer visions. I stand for change, which is my first goal. As a youth, I stand for Unity, Peace and Progress.

I stand for a free and transparent Health service attributed to (children,youths and adults) – I stand against unequal rights and segregation in roles.
I stand for Quality Education – Void of preferential treatment, equal for all.
I stand against poor governance.

I am an “Advocate For Youth”.

Share This Article
2613172

Members of the Harvard College International Women’s Rights Collective joined me to see the one-woman show MOM BABY GOD in Boston this week. The show, written and performed by Madeline Burrows, provides an inside look at the American pro-life movement in a creative yet strikingly realistic portrayal of a young pro-life teen vlogger at the fictionalized Students for Life Conference.

 

I entered the show unsure of what to expect… Burrows greeted the audience members while in-character, acting as a young participant at the Students for Life Conference. I knew that Burrows had spent months doing undercover research from within the pro-life movement, and I knew that this was what the theatre piece was based on. Burrows plays all of the pro-life characters in this 73-minute show, but her primary narrative character is a teenage girl whose parents are both heavily involved in the pro-life movement as well. Burrows embodies not only the words and thoughts of these characters (based on real life individuals), but also their mannerisms and movements in an enthralling and energetic way.

 

Burrows’ representation of numerous young adult activists and their approaches to the pro-life movement are fascinating, comprising of a punk rock teen boy, a formerly homeschooled girl, a pro-life spy, and a new-age feminist. Each character in this cast has a unique dialect and delivery, and Burrows has them all mastered. This play speaks to the unseen diversity in a movement like this, one that is actively mobilizing against the reproductive justice movement with some horrifying tactics.

 

Burrows also uses adult characters (including a crisis pregnancy clinic director, a doctor, and a reverend) to convey the rhetoric of the pro-life movement. In one scene, a piece of tape is likened to a female. In another, the audience is taught how to effectively sidewalk counsel women out of getting abortions. The generation of individuals born after Roe v. Wade is characterized as a generation of “survivors,” and abortion is likened to murder and genocide by these adult characters.

 

The powerful rhetoric and deeply invested acting in this piece was driven home by the cognitive dissonance present in the main character’s plight at this conference: she tries to reconcile her own sexual urges with the extremely anti-sex messaging of her peers and adult role models. In this conflict, she is led to perform a sexual act that may not be consensual, and she experiences a huge amount of guilt and shame from it. The culture of shame is truly embodied here, and it becomes one of the most memorable moments of the show.

 

Burrows’ MOM BABY GOD is a hilarious and heart-wrenching glimpse at the movement that works against the reproductive justice work that we do – by providing this glimpse, it has made me grateful for the access to education and care that I have, and it has also solidified and affirmed my passion for this work.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Many a time, I have tried to survey and parry the questioning effect on sex and its constituent. I believe it is a redefined commitment entitled to both parties ( man & woman ) on a divine standard.
The world we live in today define sex as a ‘social commitment’, which is a taboo to fundamental notions displayed from old.
Afore, Sex, occurs after a marriage right is fulfilled – which connects a man and a woman together perfectly. Today, sex, is now seen as an avenue to satisfy common urge.

* some say we should have sex to satisfy ourselves and set our burdens at ease.
* others say, when you feel the urge get someone to have sex with. And a girlfriend should serve as a friend with benefits.

Notion :
Sex is good and fun in the making, not to be confused with a Mutual Engagement between a male and a female. There are so many medical attributes linked to sex – one dominant property I know of is a reduction in emotional pressure or tension, resulting from ‘Anxiety’.

If we define sex on the basics of mutual engagement, then it is the right for every one (Adolescence,Teen,Youth and Adult), to have sex.
We have a situation where a boy of 16, gets a girl pregnant,at the expense of the so-called love. And the girl demands for an abortion or decides to conceive the child due to having sex at the wrong time.

Note :
There’s an increase in Abortion, Unwanted pregnancy and a retardation in fundamental growth of boys and girls. Most people who see sex as a social commitment end up having a bad experience, because they capitalise on the lust of satisfaction, instead of seeking to understand the reason for IT.

In most homes where a man considers sex more than his wife, there’s a high tendency for an upheaval of distrust to occur – which will massively dwindle their growth. Most who youths originated from these homes have become the heir of most illegal acts displayed in the world.
There’s an increase in divorce rate,children from this background become prone to harsh circumstance etc.

Youths who lack parental care and control end up doing irrational things, having unprotected and unwanted sex and other juvenile act.

I believe that if a minimum of 15% of youths are taught :

* Pre-sex affair and its influence.
* The fundamentals of sex education,
* Health education and its relation to sexuality.

Then change can commence.

My question :

* How do we educate boys and girls in : Developing and under-developed countries on sex education.

Proposed Query :

80% of youths living in these areas, constitute to the progression of illegal sex and the un-demanded notion it dictates.

Proposed Answer :

* I believe that changing the dialogue of sex affair is on great step .

Educating Youths on :
- what sex is ?
- why is sex needed ?
- what are the effects of sex on life ?
- who are the right persons to have sex ?
- And the required age for sex ?

* A notion I surveyed recently is doing a Poetry on sex-education : which will play a huge role in schools ( High school mostly, in rural and localised areas ).

In localised areas where there’s a gargantuan growth in sex rate, only few schools teach Sex education and a handful of these schools practise it.
- At locations where there are no computers for learning, no Adverts on sex-Ed, no Online orientation, and no seminars and outlets for diverse learning , an introduction to a reformed part of learning on sex education will help.

If we have a preamble poetry on sex education, health and orientation in under-developed areas, then we can help shape most of the questioning we have.

Share This Article

The anti-drug program, D.A.R.E- Drug Abuse Resistance Education- which was very popular in public schools in America, has lost its funding, popularity, and credibility within the scientific community after multiple studies found that the program was ineffective and did not lead to a decrease of drug use.

In 2001 the United States Department of Education announced that they would no longer allow schools to spend money on the D.A.R.E program after the United States Surgeon General deemed the program ineffective.

The D.A.R.E program’s mission was a noble one but also one that in some places may seem obsolete with the legalization of marijuana in certain states and several other states contemplating bills to legalize it as well.

The de-funding was a necessary and swift move by the federal government however, I wonder why the same did not and still has not happened for inadequate and ineffective abstinence only “sex education” programs.

 Many published peer reviewed journals have found that abstinence only education is ineffective.  A study by Hall and Hall found that states which taught more strict abstinence only sex education had higher correlations of unintended pregnancies and births among teens.

While reducing unintended pregnancies is a noble goal, educating young people about sexually transmitted diseases and infections has become secondary. So much so that according to the Center for Disease Control the rates of STI/STD infections in young people ages 10 to 24 continues to rise.

The funding D.A.R.E was receiving would be better served in educational programs that accurately, effectively, and honestly inform young people about their sexual health through federally funded and widely implemented comprehensive sex education. 

Young people deserve and need to know helpful and effective sexual health education from Kindergarten all the way to senior year of high school. By beginning the discussion about sexual and reproductive health early on society can begin a cultural shift in the way society refuses to accurately and honestly discuss all sexual and reproductive health topics.

D.A.R.E’s federal funds should be redirected to help youth, who will grow into young adults, learn about their sexual and reproductive health early on through holistic and comprehensive education.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

“Art begins with resistance.” – André Gide

Art has great power. It can get your attention. It can make you think. It can even change your mind. That’s why art can be such a powerful tool for activists. Now we’re asking you to use that power to change the conversation around abortion.

Host a 1 in 3 Week of Artivism event to showcase people’s real stories of experiences with abortion.

During the week of April 21-27, activists around the country will host 1 in 3 Week of Artivism events to bring new audiences to the real stories about abortion experience which people have shared with the 1 in 3 Campaign. You can participate by reserving a space on your campus or community and setting up an interactive display of stories from the 1 in 3 Campaign.

We’ll send you a “display in a box.” You assemble, personalize, and set up the exhibit. You don’t have to be Picasso to participate – you just need a display space and some time to construct the display.

Will you host a 1 in 3 Week of Artivism event?

Please register by April 4 so we can send you the supplies you need.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

The Big picture :

Rape- is a word which is supposed to be wiped out of existence. Most girls in the rural and urban ares extensively suffer from this dreadful cause. It’s a shame to see young girls go through this uncomfortable act.

Raped girls now have STDs , unwanted pregnancy and some may die as a result been bartered.

When parents mutter at words, ungodly things happen. And when girls feel reluctant they become victims to this cause. I blame non, it is simply because there’s no unity and the law holding the term for rape has almost been ridden off.

Every GIRL child DESERVES a brighter future. Why not share the word!

What\’s your say on RAPE !

Share This Article

In honor of National Abortion Provider Appreciation Day, Dr. Emily Young, who works as an abortion provider, shared her story with us.

“You saved my life,” I had told the provider.

I was 22 years old, in a just-okay four-year relationship with a just-okay guy, and I was working every second of every day towards becoming a doctor. One night while working on my medical school application, I realized I had been so stressed that I couldn’t remember when I last had a period. Time stopped. Then, the pregnancy test came back positive. The dream I had for my life went from feeling close within reach to sickeningly far, far away.

My dream was to change the world, although at the time I wasn’t sure what that meant. Nevertheless, I wanted to commit all of myself to doing so, and I didn’t feel I had enough of myself available to be the awesome mother I would wanted to be. And yet, I felt judged for doing what seemed was the right thing to do, particularly by those who shouted meanly at me outside the abortion clinic that I should “choose life”. I shouted back at them, “What on earth do you think I am doing??”

I was choosing my own life. Doesn’t a woman’s life matter, and all she can do with it? Does “life” only refer to the fetus? Too often, this message of having less-than-important lives is what is perpetuated to women around the world.  Thus, fighting for abortion rights is fundamentally apart of fighting for women’s lives.

For me in December 2005, I became eternally grateful to Planned Parenthood for providing me an abortion.  With it, they gave me the message that my life mattered. By allowing me to make my choice for my life, they were telling me they believed in my potential as a woman. They saved the life I had dreamed for myself, to go on to be a physician and save others. I walked out of their clinic that day feeling like I could breathe air in my lungs again.

I don’t know what I would have done if I had lived in an area where I couldn’t get an abortion. Just the thought of it catches my breath again, as my nauseating desperation of being unwantedly pregnant returns so easily. I remember feeling panicked enough that I would have tried anything to not be pregnant anymore. With this, I understand why women die in areas where there is no abortion access. Unskilled abortion providers that result in sepsis, coat hangers that result in uterine perforations, and even suicide become realistic options for desperate women. In countries where abortion is illegal and thus unregulated, approximately 3000 women die per 100,000 abortion procedures performed.1 Hugely contrasting, in countries where abortion is legal and safe, only 0.6 women die per 100,000 procedures.2 Take a minute to soak that in:  only 0.6 deaths in areas where abortion is legally accessible, and 3000 deaths in areas where it is illegal, taboo, potentially unsanitary, unskillfully provided, and hence, unsafe. Abortion access saves lives, not only figuratively like mine, but literally.

Almost ten years later since my story started, I’m now a doctor. I am eternally grateful to having been allowed the agency in my own patient decision-making those years ago, and I strive daily to give my patients the same. I continue to want to save the world, and to me this now means working to ensure no one can take away another’s freedom to decide his or her life. With this in mind, I am now and forever will be an abortion provider.

Several years ago, my first abortion patient said to me, “Thank you for saving my life.” I smiled, and took the moment to reminisce on my own similar past words. We both spoke our truth on the day of our abortions, and the truth is that this procedure is lifesaving in so many ways, for so many women. Let us continue to work towards safe and legal abortion access for all women. Let us celebrate our abortion providers, as they are truly lifesavers.

With gratitude on Abortion Provider Appreciation Day,

Dr. Emily Young, DO, MA, MPH

 

References:

1. Guttmacher Institute. Facts on Induced Abortion Worldwide. Accessed 3.09.14 at http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_IAW.html.

2. World Health Organization (WHO), Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008, sixth ed., Geneva: WHO, 2011.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

In honor of National Abortion Provider Appreciation Day, Alison, who works as an abortion provider and a Nurse Practitioner in California and on the board of directors of Nursing Students for Choice, shared her story with us.

On the sidewalk outside the clinic, I see her standing in white scrubs and a lab coat. A car turns right towards the parking lot and she runs in front of it, waving her arms. The driver stops, rolls down the window, then rolls it back up and pulls into the parking lot. Next to the other entrance, a poster of a bloodied fetus reads: “Abortion: a mother’s choice.”
The first day I worked at this health center, the woman in white ran at my car too. She sprinted over so fast I was scared I might hit her. Now she knows I’m an employee, not a patient, so she just scowls when I arrive.’
Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday, she is stationed outside the clinic from 8:30am-5:30pm, rain or shine. She sits in a plaid lawn chair with a white umbrella. She has pamphlets with “medical information” and doesn’t let a patient pass by without attempting to give them one. She’s been known to yell at the volunteer escorts who inform patients she’s not a real medical professional. Her determination is fierce; she seems to lack any doubt that what she is doing is not only right, but desperately needed. I can only speculate the motivation for her fervor. Does she think we are murderers? That we harm women? Disrespect life?
I’m not sure what she believes transpire behind our clinic doors each day, so I’ll describe that now. We provide birth control to women and men so they can prevent pregnancies when desired, and plan pregnancies if they choose. We counsel patients on sexually transmitted infections and how to prevent them. We treat urinary tract and yeast infections. We do breast exams and pap tests. We administer vaccine and provide primary care. We answer questions and try to make patients comfortable when examining the most intimate parts of their bodies. We provide medication abortions. We are dedicated to all aspects of the work we do.
While the bulk of my clinical work involves family planning and well-woman care, my scope of practice includes abortion and I’m proud of that. Although our clinic aims to prevent unintended pregnancies, they are still a common occurrence. Roughly 50% of pregnancies in the U.S. are unplanned and about half of those pregnancies end in abortion. So why is abortion so stigmatized and shamed? Why, after 40 years, is Roe v. Wade still under attack? How come the political right is constantly trying to amend laws to restrict access to abortion, especially for young and poor women? Why is there a protester outside my health center harassing every patient who seeks to pass through our clinic doors, whether their intention is to obtain an abortion or not?
The only answer I can come up with is that this protester, these politicians, the anti-choice movement lacks understanding of the work we do and the patients we serve. They seem to have a unilateral way of thinking: “NO ABORTIONS,” instead of a multifarious perspective, which might lead to a simple question: “Why does a woman seek an abortion in the first place?” A few possibilities: she’s 16 and wants to finish high school. She already has 4 children she’s supporting on her own. She was raped. Her birth control method failed. She’s not interested in being a mother—ever. There are infinite answers to this question, and one is not more moral than the other.
When I see the protester outside my work, I go past her as if she wasn’t there. I refuse to let her actions have any impact on me or the care I provide. I know she does not view abortion as a medical procedure, a women’s right, or a decision between a patient and her health care provider. She is entitled to her opinion and right to protest, but she will not prevent me from serving patients and presenting them with all of their options. Even if it takes another 40 years to de-stigmatize and reframe abortion care, it’s a job I’m dedicated to doing.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Every single day, abortion providers, nurses and clinic staff stand with young people, women, and their families to ensure access to safe medical care – care that 1 in 3 women will need in her lifetime.

Join us in showing your appreciation by signing a postcard for National Abortion Provider Day. They will be mailed to a provider near you!

Sadly, many abortion providers and clinic staff face significant risks, including harassment, stalking, threats to family members, and even violence. Despite these risks, they continue to stand with us and provide care.

In 1996, March 10th was declared National Abortion Provider Appreciation Day. To honor and celebrate the people who risk so much to ensure access to safe reproductive health care. Advocates for Youth is honored to stand with these brave and caring professionals.

Thank you to our good friend Heather Ault from 4000 Years For Choice for designing these beautiful appreciation postcards.

Click here to select a postcard image, and we’ll print and send your postcard to your local abortion provider.

Tweet now!On National Abortion Provider Day, I stand with providers and you can too http://ow.ly/ulWn6 #ProviderLove #1in3

 

 

tweet-now-toutAbortion providers and clinic staff face significant risks, harassment, stalking,and even violence. Despite these risks, they continue to stand with us and provide care. Show your love by sending them a thank you postcard. http://bit.ly/1qfFqZC

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Jan Brewer will not get a thank you out of my for vetoing PART of the highly homophobic and highly criticized bill that reached her desk this week after state representatives signed the bill.

She gets no congrats or thank yous because the bill should have never been drafted. While i am aware that she herself did not draft the bill she has and continues to sign very anti-abortion and anti-immigration bills under the false veil of “religious freedom.”
In her veto letter she waste no time trying to blame Obama for the troublesome bill and then goes on to a lengthy explanation as to how many “pro-religious freedom” bills she has signed. Jan Brewer is not making an iota of a step into the 21st century, she is not “keeping Arizona in the 21st century,” she is caving under national and perhaps even international pressure to not become one of the biggest anti-human freedoms bigots in America. And more notably she is caving under capitalist pressure after many big name businesses and organizations threatened to host their events in other states if Brewer did sign the bill into law.
In 2012 she signed an extreme anti-abortion bill (now a law) that essentially said “life (for a fetus) begins the first day of a women’s last period,” sex education is not mandated in Arizona but if taught it must entirely leave out talk about abortion, and any women who seeks an abortion must get counseling. The stop and frisk like anti-immigration bill (now a law) that Brewer supported and signed states that police can and should check the status of anyone they suspect is not an American citizens. How does a police officer suspect the person is not an American citizen? By simply looking at them of course.
Jan Brewer did nothing special, gets no ally cookie, and still gets to collect millions of dollars in business revenue to further her anti human freedoms laws.

While some celebrate the veto as a “huge win” I don’t see it that way.
Read full veto letter here

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
why1

It was probably the second last thesis dissertation of the day. The man over the projector was talking about the study of side effects during the combined therapy of mefipristone and misopristol used for medical abortion. As the clock on the wall was running on its third round of 60 ticks of 11 pm, i felt drenched in the hot sensation after accumulation of carbon dioxide from two hours long self breathing. The only reason that was refraining me from leaving the hall were those imposed sanctions not to leave.
I would have hardly noticed, had not the women from the panel of judge given a sign of astonishment towards the number of women receiving medical abortion at Marie Stopes, Gongabu. The number was more than 45 per month who take the service of medical abortion. The fact had not poked me to a extent of astonishment but her reaction, ” The data clearly shows people are not using contraceptives” did.
As my retina projected the picture which my lens found finally found catchy to click on, I started wondering over the hues.
Despite our knowledge, what is making us away from contraception? why do we prefer choosing medical or surgical abortion rather using a temporary contraceptives? and why not permanent contraception who are already blessed with the number we want? why don’t we use contraception? simply why don’t we?

Share This Article

Infamous “bad mom” of MTV’s Teen Mom 2 show, Jenelle Evans, recently shared with the world that she had an abortion. Feeling scared and panicked after getting off of heroin and discovering she was pregnant Jenelle decided to get an abortion and maintains that she feels no regrets. However, fans seemed just as  shocked when they found out that Jenelle’s sexual partner did not know that she had an abortion.
At the time her sexual partner was in jail and had no idea Evan’s had the abortion.
The question that I have to ask is should a women have to ask? Is she because, of sexual intercourse or romantic relationship, inherently ‘required’ to inform the other person that she is going to get an abortion and or has gotten an abortion? In a political climate that seems to believe men are more inept to make decisions about a women’s reproductive rights is it fair to judge a women for not disclosing this information? Is having any type of physical or romantic relationship with someone make it more ‘necessary’ for a women to include the male in the decision making process?
Short answer to wether a women is “required” to disclose if she’s going to have an abortion, no. Longer answer: no, but it depends on the type of relationship and the women*.
Because it is her body, her future, and her pregnancy I feel it is most certainly 100 per cent her decision whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. Men have a long history of choosing to leave a women once she is pregnant with little to no remorse, stigma, shame, or having the thankless job of being the societal scapegoat for all societies problems and because we unfortunately live in a world the still believes and maintains the ideals that it is the women’s job and duty to parent, more than the male, it should be the women’s and only the women’s place to decide what to do her a pregnancy.
*every situation is different and therefore every decision is different.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
Protest & Counter-Protest outside Planned Parenthood of the Rockies.

For as long as I have advocated for abortion rights, the conversation has always seemed to carry that old fashioned us vs. them attitude.  But from what I have experienced as of late, this issue is not one of “freedom and genocide”, or “us vs. them” as my university’s newspaper likes to claim, but one in which I believe there to be much more gray area and overlap.

The Students United for Reproductive Justice Group, of which I am apart, at Colorado State University partook in “1 in 3 Week”, a weeklong series of events aimed to raise awareness and challenge the stigma and shame around women who have had an abortion. We started by sticker bombing our campus and chalking our Free Speech Plaza. We aimed to draw attention to and start a conversation on CSU’s campus about how we treat & talk about women who have had an abortion.

What quickly developed was more of a debate than a conversation.  The morning after we chalked the plaza with 1 in 3 slogans, such as, “These are our stories” and “End the Silence and Shame,” we found a new message had been written. Students who identified themselves as “pro-life” brought their own chalk and adapted what we had written to fit into their message.  What had previously read, “Pro-Choice does not equal Anti-Life” had been altered to “Pro-Choice is Anti-Life”.  Their website address: www.silentnomoreawareness.org was written in multiple places under our slogan “End the Silence & Shame”. The short term implications of this included: 1) people might have visited their site instead of ours: www.1in3campaign.org , 2) people were/might have been unwilling to talk to us because they thought we represented an anti-choice group, 3) our message was hijacked by Student’s for Life (an anti-choice group) on the plaza in order to draw attention to themselves and their message, and 4) Our message was misrepresented in the university’s newspaper. After an article, titled “Freedom, genocide…and sidewalk chalk”, appeared in the Rocky Mountain Collegian about the plaza chalking, our club President responded with a letter to the editor clarifying what the 1 in 3 campaign stood for. As for the chalk, it was washed away within a few days by snow & rain along with any other mention of the controversy. Despite the obstacles we experienced, we continue to table in the plaza, host events, and facilitate conversations on CSU’s campus about the 1 in 3 campaign.

The long term implications of this kind of action are even more disconcerting, reaction debate.  I feel we are constantly acting in response to anti-choice protests rather than working together to find common values & goals. I believe the 1 in 3 campaign is a huge step in the right direction as it aims to tell women’s stories without bias.  That being said, there is still a long way to go and a lot of cultural stigma to overcome.  As a lifelong proponent of women’s rights, including the right to choose, I find the idea of working with anti-choice groups a challenging strategy.

The reality is, working in opposition and in reaction to anti-choice groups only creates further stagnation & fails to change the stigma around abortion. Framing abortion in a binary light perpetuates the sigma that it is a divisive issue, and that you must pick only one side.

I believe it is important to move past this if we hope to reduce the number unwanted pregnancies and the stigma and laws that prevent safe access to legal abortion. I envision pro-choice and anti-choice groups coming together to have a discussion about how to prevent unwanted pregnancies and how to support women and men post-abortion or post-partum. In having these conversations, creating common goals, and taking action, we can advance the health and well-being of all of those affected by abortion. Together we can shift how we treat these women from stigmatizing and shaming to respecting and supporting regardless of their personal decisions. There is a very clear amount of energy and passion on both sides that together, can help change the way we frame abortion.

That being said, there is a fine line to walk when working with anti-choice groups. There are major fundamental differences between the pro-choice & anti-choice movements and it’s important to stand by one’s own values. If ever these differences begin to harbor hostile interactions or cause more harm than good it is always acceptable to end your affiliation with an anti-choice group or individual.

For me personally, when I am engaging with an anti-choice group or individual I establish very clear boundaries. The first is I will not speak on the morality of the act of abortion. That meaning, I believe abortion is a very personal choice to be made between a women and her faith. I will not entertain questions on my own religious beliefs or ethical principles regarding abortion.  The second boundary I set is, I will not enter or continue a conversation if it is hostile or accusatory in nature. By choosing to only engage in conversations in which there is mutual respect I am protecting myself and the organizations I represent. I highly recommend my fellow activists establish their own boundaries before beginning to work with anti-choice groups.

I invite my fellow activists to rethink how we frame the discussion of abortion and start to explore where we have overlap with those who identify as pro-life. Shifting from a debate to a discussion can help bring clarity & productiveness in how we talk about abortion rights, the stigma and shame women who have had an abortion experience, and unwanted pregnancy prevention.

The following are some discussion ideas and solutions, in which we may find overlap:

1. Prevention of unwanted pregnancies.

  • Many anti-choice groups are not necessarily anti-contraception.
    • Work together to distribute condoms.
    • Host safe sex workshops.

2. Support women and families post-partum.

  • It is important that people’s personal choices are supported, whatever they may be. Extra support may be especially needed for parenting teens and students.
    • Cohost a diaper/ baby supplies drive for teen parents.
    • Work with schools to ensure affordable daycare is provided for parenting students.

3. Talk about abortion-related violence including personal & interpersonal.

  • Understand that abortion can be a traumatic or uncomfortable experience for both women and men, which can lead to doubts of self-worth, depression, and suicide.  Restrictive abortion laws can also force women to seek out unsafe abortions and endanger their lives.
    • Start a conversation about the language we use to ensure women are not shamed before or after having an abortion.
    • Ensure that unbiased counseling services are offered.
    • Discuss how laws pertaining to abortion can negatively impact women’s health and safety.

This semester, I hope to convene CSU’s Student’s for Life group, Student’s United for Reproductive Justice, and other interested individuals to start a conversation and identify ways in which we can work together.

By reducing the polarity of how we talk about and take action around abortion, common ground can be found. These are not always easy conversations to have but they can lead to productive ends. I challenge you to think critically about how we frame abortion and work to find common ground with those who historically been viewed as our opponents.

 

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
0-zgZBTgOQ-sCSTOsx

by Jen Sorensen via Talking Points Memo and the ACLU

Share This Article

I discovered that TED and TEDWomen have never featured a talk on abortion.

…When I asked around, the consensus was that the omission was simply an oversight. But it turns out TED is deliberately keeping abortion off the agenda. When asked for comment, TED content director and TEDWomen co-host Kelly Stoetzel said that abortion did not fit into their focus on “wider issues of justice, inequality and human rights.”

“Abortion is more of a topical issue we wouldn’t take a position on, any more than we’d take a position on a state tax bill,” Stoetzel explained. She pointed me to a few talks on women’s health and birth control, but this made the refusal to discuss abortion only more glaring. In the last three years, the United States has seen more abortion restrictions enacted than in the entire previous decade; the United Nations has classified the lack of access to abortion as torture; and Savita Halappanavar died in Ireland because a Catholic hospital refused to end her doomed pregnancy. Just how is abortion not an issue of “justice, inequality and human rights”?

  • OPPRESSED MAJORITY (Majorité Opprimée English), by Eleonore Pourriat

“On what seems to be just another ordinary day, a man is exposed to sexism and sexual violence in a society ruled by women.”

What they say: “People are just people.”  ”I don’t see color.”  ”We’re all just human.”   “Character, not color, is what counts with me.”

Response: “Colorblindness” negates the cultural values, norms, expectations and life experiences of people of color. Even if an individual white person can ignore a person’s skin color, society does not.

For all you Americans, lad mags are pornographic men’s magazines. Y’know Hustler, King, Penthouse etc.

This article by Jezebel features a study done by the University of Surrey, on the very thin line between derogatory statements in these magazines, and actual quotes from rapists.

Share This Article

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Recently fans and non fans of MTV’s Teen Mom 2 show found out that one of the cast members, Jenelle Evan’s, had an abortion. There were many mixed reactions ranging from support to anything but support and everything in between. I applaud  Jenelle for being open and standing up for herself and her reproductive decisions. Jenelle maintains that she does not regret her abortion and feels it was the correct decision for her since she was in a ‘bad place’ when she was pregnant.

Jenelle has received/earned the title of Teen Mom 2′s most infamous mother for her less than perfect life decisions, and for better or for worse experiencing it all on film for the world to see. While some may say that Jenelle gives teen moms a “bad name” the truth of the matter is Jenelle’s struggles are ones that many pregnant and parenting people, not just teens, can relate to. From drug addiction, to abusive relationships, loosing custody/signing custody over of her child, life changing decisions, and arrest all the while trying to figure out who she is, what she wants, and how to successfully reign in all the roles in her life in a healthy way. The world and viewers should give Jenelle a lot more respect and humility.
The truth of the matter is many people go through these very same things everyday, they just do not have the platform she has for people to glare at and judge them. While questionable studies want to boast a possible correlated decline in teenage pregnancy because of exploitative MTV pregnant and parenting teen shows we should be focusing on the reality of the struggles presented within the shows that no only these young women are going through on camera but how it is a shared experience among many and how support, encouragement, and policy has yet to catch up to society. 

Share This Article

Don’t Tread on Me…Or My Buffer Zone
The SSH E-Board

Happy 2014! In the spirit of starting fresh, we would like to share some good news for those of you who thought that BCSSH was waaay too long of an acronym to bring up in your frequent casual conversations about sexual health. Trip over your tongue no longer! From here on out, we will be shortening our name to Students for Sexual Health — or SHH. Or Shhhh!, if you’re in the library.

Our new name aside, there’s something that’s gotten us pretty upset over the past few weeks that we won’t Shhhh! up about. A 2007 Massachusetts law, commonly called the “Buffer Zone” law, is currently being threatened by anti-choice activists, and is set to be reviewed by the Supreme Court tomorrow, on January 15.

The Buffer Zone law is the most recent is a series of legislation that followed the fatal 1994 shooting in two Brookline health clinics. The law ensures the safety of patients and employees of health care clinics that provide abortion services against intimidating and violent protests. It mandates that anti-choice demonstrations cannot occur within 35 feet of the entrance to a health clinic, ensuring that women are safely able to access their health care without interference. The shootings that sparked the drafting of this law are certainly a tragic extreme; however, before the law was enacted, many protesters harassed patients, physically touched them, threatened women entering the clinics, and physically blocked them from leaving their cars or entering the facilities.

Almost before the ink had dried on the Buffer Zone bill, anti-choice activists challenged it, claiming that the zone was a violation of their freedom of speech. Now, the Court must balance First Amendment rights with public safety concerns. Anti-choice activists claim that the law prevents them from being close enough to talk to patients, and that by singling out clinics that provide abortion services, the law is targeting a specific kind of speech.

Last January, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld the Massachusetts law, ruling that the First Amendment ensures the right to free speech, but does not guarantee an attentive audience. It ruled that the protesters had appropriate access to patients and that it was okay for the law to target abortion clinics because officials had identified a specific public safety concern.

While SSH would like to offer a few choice words to people who seem to think that a woman’s access to healthcare is somehow the protesters’ business, we recognize that Massachusetts’ law is the closest we may be able to get to a “happy medium” between free speech concerns and patient safety. Should the Supreme Court strike down this legislation, it could also mean disaster for other state laws (Colorado and Montana, specifically) that have defined buffer zones, as well as municipalities such as San Francisco and Portland, Maine that have passed similar laws.

The Court won’t be ruling on this case until this upcoming summer, but in the meantime, you can get involved in the fight for patient safety by volunteering to be a Planned Parenthood Clinic Escort to ensure the safety of Planned Parenthood patients.

Peace, Love, and Lube
Students for Sexual Health

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
abortion131111_chart_250

Check out this awesome graphic from New York Magazine! Read the stories that accompany the image too.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Here’s a short video of me talking about what Roe vs. Wade means to me. I’d really love to hear back from other young people. It would help to dispute the rhetoric that we don’t care about the repro-justice movement anymore.

Share This Article

(reposted from USAToday, David Jackson, click for original and full post – Image of President Obama: Charles Dharapak – AP)

President Obama has put out his annual statement on the anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, praising the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that struck down anti-abortion laws.

“We reaffirm our steadfast commitment to protecting a woman’s access to safe, affordable health care and her constitutional right to privacy, including the right to reproductive freedom,” Obama said in a statement.

The president said he also wants to re-affirm commitments to “reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, and continue to build safe and healthy communities for all our children.”

 

Share This Article

Forty-one years ago, women won their constitutionally protected right to choice and gained access to safe, legal, and accessible abortions. However, soon after the passing of Roe v. Wade, legislatures quickly began to pass measures to hamper access to abortion across the globe. Even under new restrictions, women in the United States could still practice the right to decide when and if they are prepared to become mothers. However, women across the globe do not have access to abortion care due to a relatively undiscussed piece of legislation.

The Helms Amendment was passed shortly after the Roe v. Wade ruling, banning the use of any U.S. foreign assistance on abortion services, even in countries where it is legal, even in the case where the woman’s life may be in danger. Especially in poor countries, the Helms Amendment has lead to stigma, misinformation, injury and the deaths of tens of thousands of women a year.

The global aid fund is supposed to help – not harm. Unsafe abortions remains a leading cause of death for women in the global south and the Helms Amendment does nothing to protect the lives of women around the world.  With more countries reforming abortion laws, the international community is acting on the need to provide abortion services to women as part of comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare.  Unfortunately, 41 years after the passing of Roe v. Wade, the United States stands on the opposite side of the rest of the global community.

So, to our Congressmen who are “committed to reproductive rights at home and abroad” – use the anniversary of Roe v. Wade as a reminder to stay true to your commitment. Protect the lives of women. Recognize safe abortion care as a necessary intervention to ensure comprehensive sexual and reproductive health care. Understand denying abortion access is correlated with higher abortion rates and allowing access can actually decrease the rates.  Acknowledge a woman’s right to choose – both domestically and abroad – and repeal the Helms Amendment.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
Screen Shot 2014-01-17 at 12.58.52 PM

Joel Pett

 

Sonia Renee – “What Women Deserve”

 

Katie Helm – “If My Vagina Was a Gun”

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Every time I pass by my local Planned Parenthood and see a group of protesters I get really angry. I’ve never been a fan of anti-choice tactics; I feel there should be more respectful and sensitive (not to mention honest and effective) ways to protest. I believe Buffer Zones may be the only chance at having some sort of respect and sensitivity in this situation. Anti-choice protesters still get crazy even with these buffer zones in place (I’m sure we all may have heard a “protester against employee, patient, or other” horror story), imagine how much worse it would be without them.

Abortions are just like any other medical procedure and should be treated with respect and privacy. (It’s not like groups of people stand outside Plastic Surgery practices telling everybody going in “Don’t do this, you’re beautiful the way you are. God made you special this way. Love the way He made you.”)
It’s really sad that in this day and age, especially after 41 years of Roe v. Wade, that this is still an issue. Even more so, that there are people trying to reverse all the great work that has been done for women.

We need abortions to be safe and legal. Not just the actual procedure in the doctor’s office, but also the process of even walking in the building. Women deserve to be able to make their own decisions without the input or judgment of strangers. Abortion clinic staff deserve to have a safe working environment. We need Buffer Zones.

-Also if you haven’t yet, please check out the stories on http://www.1in3campaign.org/ to see how Buffer Zones have affected women. :)

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Pregnant, and Forced to Stay on Life Support

“[Marlise Munoz's] case has become a strange collision of law, medicine, the ethics of end-of-life care and the issues swirling around abortion — when life begins and how it should be valued.”

via The New York Times

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
New-Lobby-Day

(Original image can be accessed at wvfree)

Hey Fellow Activist, Bloggers, Youth, Etc…

Check out this amazing opportunity to advocate for the protection of Women’s right to access to birth control, increase awareness of teen pregnancy, and ensure the equal and fair treatment of employees who are pregnant!

For more information and to sign please lick the link!: http://www.wvfree.org/advocacy-2/2014-lobby-day/

If you can’t attend brainstorm someways to be an effective and awesome ally to women!

A little more info on Allyship (from the perspective of an Ally)

Here is my truth:  I practice being an ally to women by recognizing my privilege (male, white passing, able-bodied, college educated privilege).  I attempt to do this everyday, some days I am better than others.  For example, I often thing about the intent and the impact of what I say and how that would change if I were not in my privilege.  Or, I sometimes think about was what I said was accepted because of my privilege.

Another way to practice being an ally to women is by not engaging in behaviors that sexualize/objectify women’s bodies for the sole purpose of pleasing men and by not engaging in behaviors that demean women.

The Take Home from this is that being an ally is an active role and that as an ally it is important to be aware of your privilege and understand that intent and impact are not one in the same.  Also, that as an ally your behavior speaks louder than your words.  I can’t be an ally to women if I engage in behaviors such as treating women as less than equal and calling it chivalrous.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE ON BEING AN ALLY!

Categories: Abortion, Sexual Health
Share This Article

We as advocates for women’s health seem to take 1 step forward and 2 steps back. I just read that now Ohio is one of those states that passed more restrictions against abortion in the year of 2013. as if Roe vs. Wade was in vain. I still don’t understand why it is even up for discussion about what women do with their own bodies.

its a step back because according to City Beat, the restrictions against abortion were up almost by 100 more restrictions and Ohio is following that same trend.

so for 2014 we need to get the voices out there and we need to be at every single election no matter how small or how big it may seem.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Why 2014 Could Be A Huge Turning Point For Reproductive Rights

[Original image and post found on ThinkProgress, writer: Tara Culp-Ressler]

Roe v. Wade will mark its 41st birthday later this month, amid ever-increasing assaults on reproductive rights across the nation. According to the latest report from the Guttmacher Institute, states have imposed a staggering 205 abortion restrictions between 2011 and 2013. That legislation has attacked access to abortion from all angles — targeting providers and clinics, driving up the cost of abortion for the women who need it, making women travel farther and wait longer to get medical care, and outright banning the procedure. Since 2000, the number of states that Guttmacher defines as being “hostile” to abortion rights has spiked from 13 to 27.

That’s left abortion rights advocates on the other side, working hard to stem the tide of anti-choice attacks. Constantly warding off restrictive legislation hasn’t left much space for proactive policies to expand women’s reproductive freedom, like expanding access to maternity care or making family planning services more accessible to low-income women. Most of the headlines about abortion issues are bleak.

But there may be a shift on the horizon.

Share This Article

After Michigan House and Senate’s shameful support of a law that would force burial and cremation costs on those who sought abortions, they decided the next step would be to establish a “rape insurance” for people who have the ability to get pregnant earlier this month. The bill is infamously known as Michigan’s Rape Insurance bill, the actual name being The Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act.  It places a ban on private insurance companies from covering abortion.  This forces women into buying extra coverage for their abortion care on top of their paid plans.  What’s more is that this legislation has no exceptions for rape or incest.  And the coverage can’t be purchased during a pregnancy, it has to be bought prior to one–because those who have the ability to become pregnant are in a constant state of being pre-pregnant.

The Guttmacher Institute’s research in payment for abortion shows that almost 70% of women pay out of their own pockets for this medical procedure, and almost 52% of those women found it difficult to pay.  So, what’s to become of that 52%?  What’s to become of those who already can’t pay for the treatment they need?  We already live in a system that routinely and unapologetically ignore the needs of the people.  It’s not just a limiting of our right to the health care we need.  It’s one more step to further marginalizing those who are already feeling the burden of an oppressive, unfree economy.

Not all are sitting idly while outside groups and politicians pushed for this.  Michigan Senator Gretchen Whitmer shared her own thoughts in a Huffington Post blog:

“I shared my story of being sexually assaulted because even if it wouldn’t give my Republican colleagues pause to reconsider the vote they were about to take, I at least wanted them to, for the first time, have to directly consider the consequences of their actions and see that those being hurt by it aren’t anonymous faces, but friends, family and, yes, even their colleagues on the Senate floor.

What’s too easily dismissed in these types of discussions is that this issue is not simply about pro-choice or pro-life, it is about interfering with contracts between women and our health care providers. This new law forbids private insurance companies from covering abortions unless a woman buys additional and preemptive coverage, even in the case of rape, incest, or even medically necessary dilation and curettage (D & C) procedures for planned pregnancies that went wrong.

This measure is extreme, ignorant and insultingly misogynistic. I’m disgusted to say that it is now the law of the land in Michigan, but how it became law is just as offensive as the law itself.

Right to Life of Michigan, an extremist special-interest group with significant financial backing from a select few secretive donors, has pushed for this law twice before. Both times they failed, as two different Republican Governors stood up to them and vetoed it. In fact, in explaining his veto of this measure earlier this year, Governor Rick Snyder, someone I don’t often agree with, rightly stated, “I don’t believe it is appropriate to tell a woman who becomes pregnant due to a rape that she needed to select elective insurance coverage.”

But instead of admitting defeat, Right to Life took their crusade even further. They exploited an obscure loophole in Michigan’s Constitution that allowed them to bypass the governor’s veto entirely, as well as the will of the people, by securing the signatures of only four percent of Michigan’s population to bring a so-called “citizens’ initiative” before the legislature and then flexed their political muscle over the Republican majority, forcing them to immediately vote it into law.”

Share This Article

Buffer zone laws are meant to serve the simple purpose of aiding legal protection to abortion access and vary state to state, even country to country. They are viewed as bordering provisions for anti-abortion speakers and protestors to not infringe on the safety and well-being of an abortion provider’s patients and staff. In a few weeks, the Massachusetts buffer zone law will be heard in the Supreme Court, with anti-abortion activists and abortion activists ready and waiting. Reporters have already covered both sides of the story, and everyone in the reproductive justice community in Massachusetts is keeping a close eye on this decision.

 

With the Supreme Court hearing on Jan. 15, I wonder how the verdict will turn out. While anti-abortion activists will claim freedom of speech and assembly, these freedoms are not justified with previous histories of aggression, violence, and libel nationwide.

For those who work at the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, this decision hits close to home. Nearly two decades ago, a shooter entered a Planned Parenthood in Brookline, Massachusetts, and killed two people and wounded five others. As a result, Planned Parenthood moved to a new location, but the memory of those who died and were affected by this tragic incident sparked a movement to further protect staff and patients in abortion-providing settings.

Fast forward to 2013, and as I walk into Planned Parenthood for my internship, I see signs of defaced babies and crowds of people distributing anti-abortion material. The amount of anti-abortion activism varies, but it’s enough to know that the anti-abortion movement is strong in Massachusetts.

Let’s see what the new year brings.

Share This Article

“I invite you to find your voice and let it be known that you stand for abortion rights and the dignity of a woman to be the master of her own life and body.” – Mark Ruffalo

http://revcom.us/movement-for-revolution/stop-patriarchy/a/313/mark-ruffalo-sends-support-to-abortion-rights-freedom-ride-en.html

Original image posted by Tumblr blogger Burrsquee

Share This Article

image

 

I am a pretty big fan of sitting at home with food and shows to binge on.  And East Los High caught my full and undivided attention.  I’m not normally into soapy teen dramas, but the problems teens face everyday, especially teens of color in neighborhoods like East Los, were real.

While many find sex and the details of it to still be taboo to discuss, teens are left without the rights and respect to get the knowledge they need to better protect themselves.  I found it so refreshing to find a series that is easily relatable, stimulating, and educational.  Oh, and guess what?  Characters in the show can actually say the word “abortion.”  There wasn’t a Voldemort treatment of an actual medical procedure that one out of three women in the United States will experience in their lifetime.  Even better, several choices and paths that follow unprotected sex are explored and tidbits of helpful sexual health facts and info are casually placed into the dialogue.  There’s even brief but impactful conversations on masculinity and gender roles in regards to safe sex throughout the show.

I had a Hulu Plus account and was fortunately able to view the “Hulu exclusive” series, but anyone can watch the full episodes on the East Los High website.  It’s a good and fairly accessible teen drama with lots of examples and lessons to share.    There are little whispers about a second season to appear, and I am excitedly waiting.  Not everyone shared my enthusiasm for the show though.  An online “news” article from Life Site News expressed an opinion:

Planned Parenthood’s has its guns aimed squarely at Hispanic teens, as it continues its latest foray into eugenic targeting via an unbelievably salacious novella featuring an all-Latino/Latina cast…

What kind of public service is done by the airing of this trashy novella directed to Hispanic teens? And just what is the “moral” of Episode 1? Finish the dance with your boyfriend before dashing to the car to have sex with someone else? Watch out when you have sex in a car because someone may be videotaping you? Being voted Winter Queen will make you extremely popular on the hookup circuit?

How can anyone even use the word “moral” in connection with this series?

There are some other significant things that this writer neglects to mention besides the awesome sexual health info and examples found throughout the series.  East Los High is the first English language show with an all Latino cast.  And what is even better is that the cast defies the mainstream roles that Latino people are often forced into.  For something like this to be left out in this diatribe is quite telling of the kind of perspective the writer has, especially with the condescending and twisted but very nonexistent link between the show and fictitious eugenic attempts.

Miriam Perez, a past contributor on Racialicious, Feministing, and RHRealityCheck, has written on this topic of anti-choice movements making it seem like they care about women of color.  Her post was originally found on RHRealityCheck, but I pulled it off Racialicious.  From the succinct and eloquent post Worried About Women of Color? Thanks, But No Thanks, Anti-Choicers. We’ve Got It Covered:

At first glance, it’s nice to see the anti-choice community pretending to care about communities of color. But within a few minutes, the skepticism sets in. What’s really behind these tactics, coming from a group that is majority white, middle-class and Christian? In the end, we know this isn’t actually about women of color and their well-being. It’s a sensationalist attempt to pit women of color against the reproductive rights movement. Classic divide and conquer…

We’ve fought back against governmental policies like welfare family caps and limits on access to certain types of contraception over others. We’ve fought with the reproductive rights community to get them to care about these issues and how they affect our communities—and we’ve won.

We’re fighting for access to contraception, to abortion, to options for childbirth and parenting. And now we’ll fight the racist and paternalistic logic behind the eugenics arguments being made by anti-choicers.

Life Site News has urged concerned citizens to call  Hulu’s corporate headquarters at 310-571-4700 to remove the series and to make sure a second season contract cannot be extended.  Please use the number to the opposite.

(This has also been posted on my blogs FanTalk and STFU, Pro-Lifers.)

Share This Article
tumblr_my0lmyo4t01t2jexjo1_500

So my mom just recently found out that AFY is pro-choice, and she completely freaked out on me. This is how the conversation went down:

“So, do you want kids?”

I replied, “No, not anytime soon.”

“You would get an abortion instead of dealing with your consequences?”

“WHAT?!”

“You’re for abortion! I found out, so now you’re a baby killer!”

I literally just looked at her with a disgusted face because not once did I ever say I would get an abortion. So, I calmly said to her, “I believe in women having a choice to do whatever they like to their own bodies, I didn’t say I would do it, but having a choice is nice.”

After I said that she just looked at me with disappointment and didn’t reply because she knew this debate would turn ugly.

Just because you’re pro-choice doesn’t mean you would actually get an abortion, its a tough decision and not for everyone.

Also, people who are pro-choice shouldn’t be viewed as “baby killers”.

Every time my mom brings up this whole abortion issue, I just look at her and say, “SERIOUSLY?”

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Vote Against

As you’ve heard, there is an upcoming ballot measure in Albuquerque mandate government interference in a woman’s personal decision about abortion. This is not what Albuquerque women and families need. Vote AGAINST on Tuesday, November 19.

Extremists are flooding millions of dollars into our communities to pass the ban that would deny women access to legal abortion care.They think they know what is “best” for Albuquerque women.

This effort heartlessly disregards all of the personal considerations that go into a woman’s decision to end a pregnancy, and is a shameful attempt to limit access to safe and legal abortion care. We cannot stand in a woman’s shoes nor can we make these decisions for her.

This vote will be close, so make sure your voice is heard. Vote AGAINST on Tuesday, November 19.

If you are not registered to vote in Albuquerque, forward this email to friends and family who can and encourage them to vote AGAINST.

Advocates for Youth is proud to stand in solidarity with the Respect ABQ women campaign, a group of women, families, and allied organizations working to defeat this harmful and misleading ballot measure. Albuquerque women and families deserve respect, and that means respecting the real life decisions Albuquerque women and families face every day. Respect Albuquerque women and families. Vote AGAINST on Tuesday, November 19.

For more information or to find your polling place, click here.

If you want to join the efforts on the ground to defeat this ballot measure, RVSP for a volunteer shift here.

Paid for in kind by Advocates for Youth. Authorized by Respect ABQ Women Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains/ACLU-NM Foundation/ACLU-NM/Young Women United/Feminist Majority Foundation and not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.

Tweet now! I #RespectABQWomen & families – I’m voting AGAINST the 20 week ban on Tues Nov 19. I hope you will too. @YwuWomen

 

tweet-now-toutI #RespectABQWomenn & families – I’m voting AGAINST the 20 week ban on Tues Nov 19. I hope you will too.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Wendy Davis Redefines ‘Pro-Choice’, Enrages Anti-Choicers

“I care about the life of every child: every child that goes to bed hungry, every child that goes to bed without a proper education, every child that goes to bed without being able to be a part of the Texas dream, every woman and man who worry about their children’s future and their ability to provide for that future. I care about life and I have a record of fighting for people above all else.” – State Senator Wendy Davis

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Upcoming documentary, Young Lakota, highlights the restricted access to abortion among the Ogala Sioux tribe. The film will air Monday, November 25 at 10pm on Independent Lens on PBS.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Who invented abortions? I’ve always wondered who was the first person to decided that the practice of abortions needed to be invented! After doing some research I found that abortions date back to ancient China, but the first abortions weren’t even surgical. Surgical or not, they’re still WRONG. I hate abortions with a passion, and I don’t understand who could kill a child that they birthed. Learning how to have better sex habits would definately solve the problems of abortions, but people rather have unprotected sex than wrap it up. So what is your considerably “too young?” If you weren’t too young to have sex then you aren’t too young to take care of a child that you helped make. People should learn to woman or man up to their responsibilities and face the fact that babies are innocent. They didn’t ask to be here and they definately didn’t ask to be kilt!

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
hanging_polaroids_by_anushka04-d5h9fus

 

The image above pretty much sums up the pro-life movement. Fetuses are more valuable than women in utero. And after they are born, the same people who professed to fight for its rights suddenly couldn’t care less.

Share This Article

Recently the Nebraska Supreme Court decided that a 16 year old pregnant foster child could not have the abortion she wanted regardless of the law being on her side.
As a foster child this young woman did not need to approval of her biological parents to seek the abortion she wanted but the anti-choicer judge who has past involvement with an anti-choice group deemed her too immature to make such an “adult” decision on her own. Never mind the fact that she has cared for her younger siblings for years because her parents are addicted to drugs, that she cited her lack of financial stability and lack of stable living arrangements as reasons as to why she did not want to have a child at this point in time in her life, and the fact that she managed to navigate the judicial system to even have her case heard by an obviously bias judge; she’s the immature one. 
 
As a former teenage mother this case upsets me all too much and is not the only case in which I have heard things like this happening.
The cycle of the lack of sexual education that some adults refuse to provide young people with resulting in unintended pregnancy which prompts these very same adults to judge these young people for the unintended pregnancy is dizzying, ludicrous, and all too real for the overwhelming amount of teenagers who experience unintended pregnancies EVERYDAY.
When will these adults realize that they are partly responsible for the cycle of unintended pregnancies in young people and young adults? When will youth finally be given the agency to make healthy and well informed decision about their sexual health that they are demanding both explicitly and implicitly?
This young woman is FAR from immature or incapable on the contrary she was one of the few mature people in this entire case. What happened was because f her age she was railroaded by a terrible adult who is wrongfully a judge.

Share This Article

(Image reposted from Amplify Facebook – click here for more)

Urban Retreat 2013 was truly an experience beyond any tier.  Never have I ever been surrounded by so many like-minded individuals–as much of an oxymoron as that might sound.  We were all individuals because we all had our own story to share.  We came from many different walks of life and parts of the world.  All of us had to overcome some type of unique trauma and oppression that we were facing in our own separate lives.  But we celebrated our diversity.  And we were all there in unison trying to contribute to the vision we shared for the world.

I might have been a tiny bit apprehensive about making the trip to Washington, D.C. at first.  I wasn’t really enthusiastic about being away from my girlfriend.  It was a place I had never been to on my own.  I would be surrounded by strangers.  But these strangers quickly became my friends.  And these friends were all activists and advocates for social progress in their own communities from all over the world, so I had a lot to learn from them.  And I found, to my surprise, that I had things I could share with them as well.  Together we received training to become more effective activists and leaders.  And after the inspiring trainings and workshops, we headed to Capitol Hill together to share our stories and insight with our representatives.  It was a self-affirming and inspiring experience.

I even got to meet Janet Mock!  We talked and had dinner.  She even tweeted me and followed me on Twitter!

It’s thanks to Urban Retreat that I’ve gained new tools, resources, and concepts that would empower me and inspire me to be more involved in activism and advocacy for social justice.  And it’s thanks to Urban Retreat that I’ve gained a new family with YouthResource.  Today I woke up this morning and found myself in my own bed in Michigan.  I wasn’t in Washington, D.C. with my fellow advocates anymore.  The realization was bittersweet.  But I know I’ll see these faces soon enough with stories to share.

 

Share This Article

Texan First Lady, Anita Perry, describes abortion as a woman’s right in this interview.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Documenting the Social and Economic Benefits of Family Planning

Reposted from: Guttmacher Institute, written by Adam Sonfield

Public health experts have long emphasized the benefits to maternal and child health of helping women and couples avoid unintended pregnancy and better time and space the pregnancies they have. Notably, numerous U.S. and international studies have found a causal link between closely spaced pregnancies and three key birth outcome measures: low birth weight, preterm birth and small size for gestational age.1 And a large body of literature highlights an association between unintended pregnancy and delayed initiation of prenatal care, as women are more likely to realize early that they are pregnant if they were trying to become pregnant.

Yet, although the preventive health benefits of unintended pregnancy prevention are clear and persuasive—and, indeed, provided the impetus for the new federal requirement that most private health plans cover contraception without copays or deductibles (see “The Case for Insurance Coverage of Contraceptive Services and Supplies Without Cost-sharing,” Winter 2011)—the primary reasons American women give for why they use and value contraception are social and economic. Women know that controlling whether and when to have children has positive benefits for their lives. A pair of recent Guttmacher Institute analyses explore their motivations and the benefits they accrue from acting on them. READ MORE

 

Share This Article

Koch Bros. Give Millions to Anti-Choice Efforts in the States

Reposted from: RHRealityCheck, written by Adele M. Stan

To hear the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch tell it, they’re all about business; they don’t give a whit about those messy, so-called “social issues” like abortion, contraception, or same-sex marriage. The billions they dump into the political coffers of the right, they’ll tell you, are to further what they call “free enterprise” (translate: killing unions and regulations on business) and, more generally, “freedom” (by which they generally mean freedom from things they don’t like, such as regulations and unions).

But a blockbuster report published Thursday by Politico reporters Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei shows otherwise. How else to explain why Freedom Partners, a shadowy group that Politico refers to as the “Kochs’ secret bank” gave $8.2 million to the virulently anti-LGBT, anti-abortion Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee (CWALAC), which lobbies for such bills as the recently passed law in Texas that will effectively ban all abortion 20 weeks after fertilization, and includes unnecessary and onerous regulations on abortion clinics that are designed to compel many to close their doors.

Share This Article

Texas woman drives four hours to Planned Parenthood after being shamed for hickey

Reposted from: Raw Story, written by David Edwards

A Texas woman who was shamed by her doctor for having a hickey and wanting birth control says she is now forced to drive four hours to a Planned Parenthood clinic for health care due to the state’s new anti-abortion laws.

Athena Mason told KUT that her first visit to the doctor as a student at Texas A&M was awkward.

“I had a hickey and the doctor was just like, you shouldn’t be doing that,” she recalled. “I’m like, ‘It’s a hickey, it’s nothing major.’ But I got a big lecture. [He said] my boyfriend was abusive and all of these things. And then I asked for birth control. I did not hear the end of that. So I said never mind, I’ll go somewhere else.”

Mason started using the Planned Parenthood clinic in Bryan. But that facility is one of four women’s health service providers that closed in August after the state passed new regulations restricting abortions.

So Mason now drives four hours to the Planned Parenthood clinic in Austin for health care.

In 1998, Cadence King was diagnosed with pre-cancerous cells on her cervix and became a patient at the Planned Parenthood clinic in Bryan. She had returned for regular checkups in the years since, but she has missed visits in recent weeks because the clinic closed.

King is now struggling to find a new health care provider. Her only options are driving three hours to Beaumont or waiting four months for the next opening with the one Bryan clinic that’s willing to take her case.

 

Share This Article

Just yesterday on a Friday afternoon, I posted the petition to make The Real Education for Healthy Youth Act a reality on my reproductive justice blog.  It’s not much, but it’s already gained a little less than 900 notes on Tumblr.  Popular blogs like ST*U, Sexists and F*ck Yeah, Sex Education just gave the petition a signal boost and I’ve seen a lot of #vision4sexed hashtags on Twitter, so we’ll be sure to see more feedback before September 10.  And the youth activists have been out and about getting physical signatures, which is something I’m doing once school is back in session.  Some people are reblogging it with their own commentary to emphasize the importance of it, and sometimes it’s all in caps so you know it’s a pretty big deal.  Especially with our current culture’s views on sexuality and education.  No one should have to suffer another abstinence only class in which our youth, especially girls, are compared to used up candy wrappers and dirty pieces of tape if they’re sexually active.  If you haven’t already and you support comprehensive sex education, definitely sign the petition and share it!

The petition page lets you know exactly what you’re saying when you’re leaving behind a signature:

I support the Real Education for Healthy Youth Act, a sex education vision that outlines what young people truly need. The bill not only authorizes funding for comprehensive sex education directed towards adolescents and college students, but also prioritizes teacher training so that our nation’s educators have the tools they need to be effective in the classroom.

Let’s work to realize our vision of young people receiving the sex education they need in order to lead healthy lives and have healthy relationships. We owe it to them to provide them honest sexual health education. With the Real Education for Healthy Youth Act we can start bringing our vision for sex ed to life!

My vision for sex education includes letting our youth know that it’s never okay to shame others for being sexually active or abstinent by choice.  My vision for sex education also includes teaching our youth the signs of an abusive relationship, whether it’s emotional, physical, or both.  I’d love for there to be discussions that include the LGBTQ community because often they are erased from the topic, leaving many without resources.  I find it to be very dangerous to let our youth go through life without the tools they need to have healthy lives.  Comprehensive sex education just makes perfect sense to me.  What’s your vision for sex ed?

Share This Article

Ireland Has Performed Its

First- Ever Legal Abortion,

And It Saved A Dying Woman’s

Life

(Re-posted from ThinkProgress)

The first legal abortion in an Irish hospital has been carried out in Dublin, the Irish Times confirmed on Friday. It represents the first pregnancy termination under Ireland’s historic new abortion law, which slightly relaxed the country’s total ban to allow for legal abortions in cases when it’s necessary to preserve a woman’s life.

Before Ireland’s prime minister approved the new law in July, the country’s abortion laws had not been updated since 1867. Now, there are 25 Irish hospitals that are authorized to perform legal abortions in life-threatening cases without worrying about legal repercussions.

The National Maternity Hospital in Dublin carried out the pregnancy termination for a dying woman whose membrane had ruptured for more than 24 hours. She ran a high risk of sepsis, and her 18-week twin fetuses had no chance of survival outside of the womb. Doctors said her case bore many similarities to that of Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old woman who died after being denied an emergency abortion in an Irish Catholic hospital last year. Halappanavar developed sepsis after she began to miscarry, but doctors wouldn’t terminate her doomed pregnancy until the fetal heartbeat had officially stopped three days later — and by that time, it was too late.

The Irish Times reports that in contrast to Halappanavar, the woman who received a legal abortion this month “has made a good recovery after receiving antibiotic treatment and undergoing the termination a number of weeks ago.”

Ireland’s new abortion law was spurred by Halappanavar’s tragic death, which sparked a global controversy. Reproductive rights activists vowed that an individual would “never again” be denied the life-saving medical care that could avert this type of tragedy. But even though Ireland has slightly relaxed its stringent abortion law to successfully avert another Savita, a handful of other conservative Catholic countries still impose total bans on the procedure. Following Halpannavar’s death, similar controversies have unfolded in El Salvador and Chile.

The Guttmacher Institute’s research has found that harsh bans on abortion don’t actually lower abortion rates. Instead, they simply encourage women to risk their lives to end a pregnancy illegally. An estimated 47,000 women around the world die each year from unsafe abortions — and that figure doesn’t include women like Halpannavar who die from pregnancy-related complications that an abortion could have averted.

SOURCE

Share This Article

Ohio Republicans Pledge to Reintroduce Heartbeat Ban

“We are ready to start the fire again,” said state Rep. Christina Hagan at the press conference, which was filled with reporters as well as members of the Duggar family, reality television stars who have become some of the new faces of the evangelical anti-choice movement.

Speaking in favor of the ban was Michelle Duggar, matriarch of the 19 Kids and Counting family. With 17 of her 19 children in tow, Duggar spoke against the “baby holocaust” occurring in the United States, a talking point she also used at a Texas press event roughly a month ago: “There is a baby holocaust taking place, where doctors and nurses are paid to take the lives of innocent, unborn children. … If we do not speak up and do something to stop this holocaust, the blood of these little ones will be on our hands.”

Michelle’s oldest son, Josh, was recently named executive director of FRC Action, the political arm of the right-wing Christian group Family Research Council, an avid heartbeat ban supporter.

Share This Article

Prison Birth: Exploring Prison Justice Through Orange is the New Black

(Re-posted from Because I Am Woman an AH-MAZING sex-positivity, sex-ed, feminism, reproductive justice, birth justice, intersectionality, and activism blog. Check them out, and THANK YOU for letting us post this piece here.)

Orange is the New Black has been getting a lot of press lately, and it is certainly well deserved. The dark comedy features a dynamic and multi-faceted cast of women and gives a first-hand look into many of the realities women in prison face that are often left out of the conversation in mainstream culture and other prison related media. The visibility of the series has opened up many vital conversations on topics such as birthing, healthcare for trans people, mental health, privilege, sexuality and even the prison industrial complex itself. Over the course of the next couple of weeks, I will be exploring these issues (and more) through the lens of the Orange is the New Black.

First up, we will be taking a good hard look at birthing in prison. Although birth has been an increasingly popular topic in reproductive justice and feminism in recent years, people experiencing it in prison aren’t often considered as part of the equation. In Orange is the New Black we are introduced to what birthing in prison might look like for people who are incarcerated when one inmate, Ruiz, is about to give birth during episode 8. Over the course of the episode, (although only a minor plot point), we see Ruiz go into labor and be told by a pharmacy tech that she may not go to a hospital until her contractions are extremely close together. When the time finally comes, Ruiz is taken away only to return at the end of the episode silently wheeled back into a room of women without her child. As the room of women turn to look at her, the silence that fills the room provides viewers with a shared sense of loss and sadness for the new mother, one that is likely in prison for a minor crime, who has already been taken from her child.

What we saw in this episode is only the beginning of what pregnancy and birth actually look like for many in prison. According to The Prison Birth Project, “In prison, 4-7% of women are pregnant, the same percentage as in the wider population; 85% are mothers, and 25% were pregnant upon arrest or gave birth in the previous year.” This demonstrates that reproductive health and pregnancy are clearly an issue for those incarcerated, and an issue that cannot be ignored in the reproductive justice movement. There is a need for education, advocacy, and support amongst these populations.

The reality of giving birth for many prisoners is also much worse than what we saw on Orange is the New Black. Many in prison are denied the medical care they need (pre and post-natal), and many more give birth still shackled in prison instead of in a hospital. Although advocates in many states have been pushing for change, only 16 states have passed legislation to outlaw the barbaric shackling of prisoners birthing and in labor. In their report “Mothers Behind Bars”by the National Women’s Law Center and the Rebecca Project for Human Rights, the organizations gave almost half of all states a failing grade for their treatment of pregnant and birthing people, and point out that there is no national standards for treatment and care of those who experience pregnancy behind bars.

Fortunately, there are people and organizations out there organizing around these issues. The Prison Birth Project and Birth Behind Bars both act as advocates in their respective areas and bring doulas into prisons to aid in birth and pregnancy. You can support them by volunteering your time, money and support, as well as by continuing to spread the word on these issues.

As for Orange is the New Black, we can likely count on this not being the last pregnancy and/or birth we see in the series. Since the pregnancy of Daya by a prison guard is a much bigger plot point in the show, it is my hope that we see a more well-rounded and realistic depiction of what this experience looks like for inmates in the second season.

BECAUSE I AM WOMAN

Share This Article

Here we go again. Although the most restrictive abortion bill (‘the Heartbeat bill’) in the nation was tabled in Ohio’s last Senate session, it’s coming back – and this time with the full backing of America’s largest reality TV family, the Duggars. The Duggars are from Arkansas which is currently the home to the most restrictive abortion ban in the country, banning abortion after 12 weeks of pregnancy.  Arkansas got the idea from Ohio, where the bill would ban abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected, which could occur as early as 6 weeks of pregnancy, often before a woman even knows she’s pregnant. Unlike Arkansas’ bill, Ohio’s bill does not include an exception for cases of rape or incest, or the health of the woman. The Ohio bill passed the House but stalled in the Senate.

Ahead of an inevitable bill reintroduction, the Duggars participated in a press conference at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus to show their support for this extreme and heartless bill. During the press conference, mother of the brood, Michelle Duggar, crudely asserts that “there is a baby holocaust taking place” across the nation.

Gross overstatements such as this won’t help their cause. Opponents are geared up to take on the threat with rallies and conferences already in the works. Grassroots activists and statewide organizations are primed to defend against this bill again. Arkansas is seeing court challenges and so will Ohio if it goes that far. Let’s make sure that it doesn’t. Get ready to fight!

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

One year ago, then-Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) uttered his infamous “legitimate rape” comment when explaining his opposition to abortion even in the case of rape. The comment gave the public a rare peek into the extreme views Akin and other like-minded conservatives have on reproductive rights and how fundamentally misinformed they are on matters of basic biology.

The comment was the beginning of the end of Akin’s Senate run. But while it may have cost him an election, it hasn’t stopped Republicans across the country from trying to legislate legal abortion out of existence. On Friday, the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) quantified those efforts in a new report, Shut That Whole Thing Down: A Survey of Abortion Restrictions Even in Cases of Rape. The report looks at abortion legislation in the states and Congress from the first half of 2013 and finds that:

  • 86 percent (235) of the 273 provisions that politicians introduced in state legislatures to restrict a woman’s access to abortion apply to a woman whose pregnancy resulted from rape.

  • 71 percent (27) of the 38 state provisions restricting women’s access to abortion enacted by the states apply to a woman whose pregnancy resulted from rape.

  • 72 percent (18) of the 25 bills introduced in Congress to restrict a woman’s access to abortion apply to a woman whose pregnancy resulted from rape.

Source: http://rhrealitycheck.tumblr.com/

Share This Article

Fetal Pain Is A Lie: How Phony Science Took Over The Abortion Debate

New laws banning abortion after 20 weeks are based on pseudoscience — and real research proves it conclusively.

This article originally appeared on Salon.com.

Since Nebraska first jump-started the trend back in 2010, close to a dozen state legislatures across the country have passed laws banning abortion at 20 weeks. Most of these restrictions are given grave-sounding titles like the “Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act,” or some near-identical riff on the words “fetal,” “pain” and “protection.” All of them, no matter what they’re called, rest on the stated premise that a fetus can experience pain at 20 weeks, and that this is a sufficient justification to ban all abortions after this gestational stage.

But “fetal pain” in the popular discourse is a nebulous concept, one that lawmakers like Jodie Laubenberg, Trent Franks and others haven’t much bothered to define or help ground in available medical evidence.

Probably because there really isn’t any. The limited research used to support such claims has been refuted as pseudoscience by both the Journal of the American Medical Association and the British Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (Not to mention smaller studies from researchers at Harvard University, University College London and elsewhere.)

“We know a lot about embryology [in the field]. The way that a fetus grows and develops hasn’t changed and never will,” Dr. Anne Davis, a second-trimester abortion provider, associate professor of clinical obstetrics and gynecology at Columbia University Medical Center, and consulting medical director at Physicians for Reproductive Health, told Salon. “And what we know in terms of the brain and the nervous system in a fetus is that the part of the brain that perceives pain is not connected to the part of the body that receives pain signals until about 26 weeks from the last menstrual period, which is about 24 weeks from conception.”

Because the neural structures necessary to feel pain have not yet developed, any observable responses to stimuli at this gestational stage — like the fetal “flinching” during an amniocentesis — are reflexive, not experiential. Which is to say, the fetus at 20 weeks can’t actually feel anything at all. Which is to say, the fundamental justification for these laws is a really big, really popular lie.

Share This Article

North Carolina House Republicans sneak abortion rules into motorcycle safety bill without notice

North Carolina House Republicans have, without notice, inserted sweeping changes to the state’s abortion rules into a motorcycle safety law. Effectively, they’ve reintroduced the abortion bill that Governor Pat McCrory had threatened to veto.

 

Share This Article

On July 30th, my Fellowship with Planned Parenthood Health systems ended. Working for PPHS has truly opened my eyes to the services that are available to both women and men here in the Columbia area. The staff is extremely nice and welcoming, and they know exactly how to help you. If you are looking for a new reproductive healthcare provider, go check them out! They are located at 2712 Middleburg Drive. For additional information on their office information, text SEXT to 74574.

 

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

When we hear about politicians making unqualified and uneducated statements about abortion and reproductive/sexual health, we just shake our heads, asking ourselves and our peers, “How does someone like that get into office?”

Not to diminish your faith in humanity, but less than a couple weeks ago, Brian Nieves, a Republican state senator of Missouri, commented in a Facebook argument to a pro-choice priest, “‘Life of the Mother?’ Your own argument proves it is a matter of convenience!”  State senator Brian Nieves later denied that he said this.  But the denial wouldn’t do him any good since his comments have been screencapped and the comment is still on the Facebook page.

There are people who treat this like it’s an isolated incident.  Like it’s nothing to worry about, but you’d have to imagine the kind of culture it takes to condition people to be able to say these things.  You don’t even have to imagine because that’s the culture we’re living in.  It’s not just one old, white male politician.  It’s several.  And they’re not necessarily always white men.

Brace yourself.  This is pretty triggering.

“These Planned Parenthood women, the Code Pink women, and all of these women have been neutering American men and bringing us to the point of this incredible weakness…We are not going to have our men become subservient.”

— Florida Rep. Allen West expresses a clear understanding of how oppression and privilege works.

“In the emergency room they have what’s called rape kits where a woman can get cleaned out.”

— Texas state Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, discussing why there shouldn’t be a rape or incest exception in bills restricting reproductive health care because clearly she understands how health care works.

“I think even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something God intended to happen.”  —Richard Mourdock, an Indiana state senator candidate who fortunately did not win.

“Understand though, that when we talk about exceptions, we talk about rape, incest, health of a woman, life of a woman. Life of the woman is not an exception.”

—Joe Walsh, former Illinois congressman revealing just how “pro-life” he really is.

“If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”

—Missouri Representative Todd Akin basically sharing how much he doesn’t know about a female body in one terrible sentence.

“The facts show that people who are raped —who are truly raped—the juices don’t flow, the body functions don’t work and they don’t get pregnant. Medical authorities agree that this is a rarity, if ever.”

—former North Carolina Rep. Henry Aldridge using imaginary doctors as his sources.

“As long as it’s inevitable, you might as well lie back and enjoy it.”

—Clayton Williams regarding rape, he was a former Texas Republican gubernatorial contender and a past fundraiser for John McCain.

This is one of the many reasons why I’m in total support of Advocates for Youth.  The politicians I’ve listed are the kind of people who have been supporting legislation that not only hurts people who need abortions, but rape victims and teens in desperate need of comprehensive sex education.  It hurts people who need access to contraception, affordable health care, and everything else a person would need to live a quality life.  And it’s not going to stop until we change the culture and institutions that allows it to happen.  So, we advocate for the youth.  We have a responsibility to them to ensure that they have their rights and are to be respected.

Share This Article
Untitled

Young sexual and reproductive rights advocates continue to push for the full integration of a rights-based approach in relation to advancing population and development goals. That was the overarching message of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the United Nations Population Fund’s (UNFPA) Regional Youth Summit.

Earlier this summer, I had the opportunity to travel to Istanbul, Turkey, where activists representing over 40 international organizations gathered and developed a Call to Action, ensuring young people sexual and reproductive rights continue to be integrated in development agendas.

The summit brought together a diverse group of 40 young people from Eastern Europe, North America, Central Asia and Israel (EECARO region), to discuss and develop priority goals. During the summit, we organized ourselves into three sessions based on interest and expertise

  1. Population Dynamics and Sustainable Development,
  2. Families, Sexual and Reproductive Health over the Life Course,
  3. Inequalities, Social Inclusion and Rights.

After lengthy conversations, each group came up with a number of recommendations to share with the entire forum for us all to debate and finalize. The culmination of our work was translated into a solid document that represents what the youth from the EECARO region want elected officials and  leaders to take into consideration. You can access the full document here.

The outcome of the summit embodied the youth vision and development priorities for the region over the next decade and was presented at the Regional Conference in Geneva. Fifteen delegates from our group (bearing in mind equal representation) attended the Geneva Conference and shared our declaration (Youth Call to Action). The speech, delivered by Grace Wilentz from YouAct (European Youth Network on Sexual and Reproductive Rights) and Jakub Skrzypczyk from Youth Coalition for Sexual and Reproductive Rights can be found here.

On a personal note, I had a great time interacting with all the youth participants at the Regional Youth Forum and learning more about the EECARO region. It became clearer to me that the same sexual and reproductive health and rights issues we are advocating for in the US are found in other parts of the world. I was happy to discover that we are not alone in this battle. Young people from all over the world are rising up to the challenge, demanding greater youth representation in world affairs and better human rights conditions for all.

 

 

About United Nations Population Fund’s (UNFPA)

Tasked with the mission of delivering “a world where every pregnancy is wanted, every birth is safe, every young person’s potential is fulfilled,” UNFPA is a UN organization whose efforts are guided by two main frameworks, 1) the Program of Action adopted at the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) and 2) the Millennium Development Goals (MDG), which are eight targets to reduce extreme poverty by 2015.

With the date for achieving these goals fast approaching, UNFPA and its partners, such as the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), have been working together to ramp up their efforts. UNFPA and UNECE have been involved in the Beyond 2014 Review, an effort to engage world leaders from governments and civil society in drafting a new global commitment to create a more equal and more sustainable world.

The ICPD Operational Review has been taking place as part of the Beyond 2014 Review, and UNFPA and UNECE have been facilitating this process. Within this process, UNFPA and UNECE organized three thematic meetings on the following topics:

  1. “Population Dynamics and Sustainable Development”,
  2. “Reducing Inequities, Fostering Social Inclusion” and
  3. “Life Course, Sexual and Reproductive Health, and Families”.

As a culminating event, the agencies planned for a two-day Regional Conference entitled “Enabling Choices: Population Priorities for the 21st Century,” which was just held in Geneva (1-2 July), gathering leaders from all over the EECARO region (Europe, North America, Central Asia and Israel).

Young people are at the core of the UNFPA’s mandate, offering an essential voice to help shape the future development agenda. Therefore, young people have participated in the operational review at the country level and in all the thematic meetings mentioned above. In order to continue their involvement, UNFPA EECARO has organized the Regional Youth Forum in Istanbul (30-31 May) and in which I participated, representing Advocates for Youth and the US at large.

Share This Article

Latin America is home to five of the seven countries in the world in which abortion is banned in all instances, even when the life of the woman is at risk: Chile, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, and the Dominican Republic, with the Vatican City and Malta outside the region.

Why? The politics of abortion in Latin America

Share This Article

All too often our stories are told for us. Last week, I had the honor of presenting to members of congress, their staff and other people in the reproductive health and rights field during a congressional briefing with Black Women’s Health Imperative. I took this opportunity to use my voice as an African American young person to tell anyone listening that we Millennials are not only invested in creating change but we are committed to making sure our generation can lead healthy lives. Read what I had to say! 

As a member of Advocates for Youth’s Young Women of Color Leadership Council, I have been organizing and advocating around the sexual and reproductive health and rights of young people for the last 5 years. I am dedicated to this work not only because I believe that young people like me deserve the right to lead healthy, self-determined lives, but also because I know first-hand what it is like to navigate this world without access to accurate and honest education and services.

At 23 I can say that I never received any type of formal sexual education from any educational institution I attended. The first time I was tested for HIV happened completely by accident. One day during my junior year in high school I wandered into a mobile testing unit in hopes of receiving a free metrocard. That would be the first day I would find out about HIV and other STIs. The woman conducting my test asked me if I was nervous and I proceeded to tell her no and then asked her would I have a reason to be. She began to explain sexually transmitted infections and diseases to me. Thus giving my first “sex education class” in the back of a mobile testing unit. Although my results that day revealed that I was not HIV positive, I remember feeling like someone had robbed me. I felt cheated. Lied to. I could not fathom at that time how learning about preventing diseases that could potentially make you sick and claim your life were not as important as math and science. The even more depressing part is that even when I went to college many of my peers were still uneducated about their sexual health, and how prevent HIV, STIs and unplanned pregnancies. I began wondering whether we all needed to wander aimlessly into a mobile testing truck to learn about saving our lives.

As leader of a campus organization that provided sexual health information specifically geared toward Black and Latino students at Syracuse, it became more and more clear to me that I was not the only person who had been robbed. Some of our campus events attracted over 200 young people interested in learning about what they could do to lead sexually healthy lives. Many of these young people expressed that they felt that this is something that should be taught in school, by the administration. They were not alone.

Not only do African American Millennials believe that comprehensive sexuality education should be available to young people in high school, overwhelming majority, over 90% believe that it should include information about preventing HIV/AIDS and other STDS, unplanned pregnancy prevention, and abstinence. Over 80% also believe that comprehensive sex education programs in high school should cover information about pregnancy options including abortion.

Many of the young people I worked with in college constantly spoke about the barriers, many financial, to accessing contraception and abortion services. Research shows that over 90% of African American Millennials believe that contraception needs to be available and affordable to help young people stay healthy. 75% of African American Millennials believe that regardless of how they feel personally, abortion should remain legal and that women should be able to get safe abortions.

There is still much to be done to ensure that young people like myself have access to medically accurate and culturally competent information regarding their sexual health, and we young people across the country are working diligently and organizing to make it happen.. While the media and other people are committed to portraying my generation as apathetic and removed from this type of work, I can insure you that those statements are indeed false. In fact, according to research conducted by the Reproductive Justice Communications Group and Advocates for Youth, over 7 in 10 of African American millennials say they are interested in improving young people’s access to sexual health services such as contraception and testing for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. 7 in 10 expressed interest in getting personally involved in promoting honest and accurate sex education programs in their communities. Another 6 in 10 are personally interested in making sure that safe abortion is available and accessible in their community. We African American Millennials are interested and committed to helping our friends, our families and our communities access services and information to live healthy, autonomous lives.

Here’s video of my remarks at the briefing!

Share This Article

On the same day that Texas Governor Rick Perry signed a controversial abortion omnibus bill into law, Republican legislators in the state introduced yet another anti-abortion measure, this time looking to ban abortions after 6 weeks. And while it seems very unlikely at this point that the bill will make it through the state’s legislative process by July 31, the end of the current special legislative session in Texas, the timing is still drawing a decent bit of attention.

There’s only one state in the U.S. with an abortion ban after 6 weeks: North Dakota. And that law is being challenged in the courts as unconstitutional. The 6-week bans, like the one proposed in Texas, rely upon the detection of a fetal heartbeat by a doctor. Arguing that a fetal heartbeat is “a key medical predictor that an unborn child will reach live birth,” the Texas bill, HB59, would require doctors to determine whether a fetal heartbeat exists before legally performing an abortion. Fetal heartbeats typically register at around 6 weeks, meaning that the bill would effectively make that the cut off for the procedure.

READ MORE HERE.

Share This Article

 

RemovetheGag

Before President Obama took office, foreign non-governmental organizations receiving international family planning funds couldn’t answer women’s questions about abortion. They couldn’t provide abortions, refer women to abortion providers, or advocate for safe abortion care in their communities and their countries – even using their own funds.

It was called the Global Gag Rule. And it could come back at any time unless we take action today.

Ask your Members of Congress to co-sponsor the Global Democracy Promotion Act to permanently repeal the Global Gag Rule.

The Global Democracy Promotion Act (GDPA), introduced today by Representative Nita Lowey (D-NY) and over 114 of her colleagues, protects foreign assistance programs from politicized restrictions, especially the Global Gag Rule. This legislation accompanies a parallel bill in the Senate introduced earlier this year by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA).

The Global Gag Rule endangers women’s health. It forces organizations to make a choice: refuse to answer women’s questions about abortion, or lose funding. The end result is that some of the most effective and experienced providers and clinics are forced to close, often dismantling the only health services available in a community. Not only is this policy dangerous to women’s health and lives, it also violates our own democratic principles of free speech and open debate by silencing advocates who wish to reform their own national abortion laws.

Since 1984, the Global Gag Rule has ridden a merry-go-round of being rescinded and reinstated in accordance with each new President’s priorities. President Obama rescinded it in 2009 – but any new President could reinstate it. The personal decisions a woman makes with her doctor shouldn’t depend on whoever happens to occupy the White House at any given time.

Contact your Members of Congress today and ask them to co-sponsor the Global Democracy Promotion Act.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Flea markets are a one-stop place where people can get every-day necessities, often at a low price or second-hand. Among clothing, food, and furniture a Texas women can also find pills that induce miscarriage, an evocative sign of the role of family planning in everyday life. The pills, known by their brand name, Cytotec, were designed to prevent stomach ulcers, but are being taken without a prescription by many Texan women and causing complications such as extended bleeding and incomplete abortions.

In the Lower Rio Grande Valley, a region along the southeastern border of Mexico, these pills are reportedly popular.  One of the states and nation’s most low-income areas, women of the Valley have already had difficulty accessing reproductive health care after the state cut funding for birth control in 2011.

HB 2, the Texas abortion bill that is awaiting Governor Rick Perry’s signature will further restrict access to family planning and reproductive health clinics across the state. Unless clinics meet the requirements of ambulatory surgical center standards within a year, these locations will be forced to close, pushing women to seek risky alternatives. The two clinics currently in the Lower Rio Grande Valley do not meet the requirement of the bill. If these centers close down, women will have to travel hours across that state to receive care and will have additional costs such as transportation, hotel, food, missed work, and childcare.

Erlinda Dasquez, a 29 year-old mother of four who has used the pills, sees the widespread desire for these pills an economic issue. She described how for $40 she received four pills, a sum much less than the $550 pharmaceutical abortion cost at the closest legal provider. Many women and families like Dasquez seek illegal and unsafe forms of abortion due to the staggering costs of abortion which are typically not covered or subsidized by insurance companies or the state. Many undocumented women are also taking Cytotec and similar drugs. These women cannot utilize traditional health care outlets for fear of being reported.

The clinics that are being threatened do not solely provide abortion services. Many of these facilities are a source of free or inexpensive birth control for families, a valuable resource. Without assistance, many low-income people cannot justify paying the amount for contraceptives among other economic priorities. When interviewed, Alma Saldana said, “If I had $100 to pay for birth control or pay the bill for lights, I’d pay the lights”. Saldana stopped taking birth control after two nearby clinics closed and the remaining clinic charged more than she could afford.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-11/flea-market-abortions-thrive-as-texas-may-close-clinics.html

Share This Article

Former CNN (now Fox News) contributor Erick Erickson wants women everywhere to know that we should all stock up on hangers. Basically, abortion is now DIY since all the old, white men have refused to give us bodily autonomy. I’m so full of rage it brings tears to my eyes. There is so much injustice.

Also, how the hell is this man allowed to work for a news source? But then, it’s Fox news. And we all know Fox plays by a different set of rules than the rest of us.

This is beyond disgusting.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

It seems like many around the nation were watching the Texas legislation, regarding abortion access, with high levels of fear, uncertainty and bated breath. Hundreds of women fought to get their testimony brought into the legislative session and they eventually began to be turned away as they were told that their testimony was becoming too “repetitive.” While the women of Texas struggled to get their voices heard, Representative Wendy Davis took the stand to announce, “The leadership may not want to listen to TX women, but they will have to listen to me.” The tides turned allowing for a small victory to the relief of the rest of the country.

 

With this small victory, it can be easily forgotten that many of these same battles, or sometimes even worse battles, are still being waged all over the country for women to have the right and access to abortions without unforeseen barriers. In Wisconsin, Gov. Walker is attempting to pass a bill that forces women seeking an abortion to have an invasive, unnecessary and patronizing ultrasound. And just a few days ago, Republicans in Ohio added an abortion provision to a budget that passed their legislation: the infamous heartbeat bill, which requires doctors to seek a fetal heartbeat and tell the woman seeking an abortion that it has one. Again, invasive, unnecessary and dehumanizing to the woman involved. While it feels good to win a battle, the rest that are being lost quickly around the country are just as reflective of the immense obstacles we still face in providing free, unrestricted reproductive freedom to the women of the US for generations to come.

To locate an abortion clinic/provider in your area, you can text SEXT to 74574.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

Across the country — in Texas, Ohio, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and too many other states — access to safe abortion care is vanishing before our eyes because of unnecessary and burdensome restrictions.

How can we keep up our commitment to women’s health, even as far right politicians force more and more anti-abortion bills through state legislatures?

We do it by changing the culture of shame and stigma around abortion. We do it by sharing stories and by speaking up in support of women.

Share your story with the 1 in 3 Campaign today.

Whether you have a personal experience with abortion, or want to share why you support women’s access to care, you can speak out with 1 in 3.

Be a part of creating a culture of compassion, empathy, and support for access to basic health care.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

When I mention the term taboo I DO mean the game in which you guess the word someone on your team is explaining. I mean taboo as in  is a vehement prohibition of an action based on the belief that such behavior is either too sacred or too accursed for ordinary individuals to undertake, under threat of supernatural punishment as explained by Wikipedia(you know you refer to that site).  Parents today are just not taking the initiative to  teach their kids or even answer questions.Everything starts at  home.  The schools does not enforce sexual education like they should hence why advocates does the work they do.  I hearing all kinds of things that are just plain crazy and I have to correct the young people and send to different resource. If different organizations are providing the resources then parents should back the kids it’s only right.  I want education for all dispite the topic. If only I can educate the world.Sex shouldn’t be taboo instead it’s should be talked about.  I am positive parents don’t want students learning from the wrong person.

Share This Article

APIreland’s lawmakers voted 138-24 to back a bill legalizing abortions in life-threatening cases. The proposed law faces final passage next week.

Prime Minister Enda Kenny easily prevailed as he sought all-party endorsement of his government’s Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill.

Ireland, almost uniquely in Europe, officially bans abortion in all circumstances. But the Supreme Court in 1992 ruled that terminations should be legal if doctors deem one essential to safeguard the life of the woman — including from her own suicide threats.

Photo: This Saturday, Nov. 17, 2012 file photo shows abortion rights protesters holding pictures of Savita Halappanavar as they march through central Dublin, demanding that Ireland’s government ensures that abortions can be performed to save a woman’s life. (Shawn Pogatchnik / AP file)

Share This Article

I decided to break the law to provide a necessary medical service because women were dying at the hands of butchers and incompetent quacks, and there was no one there to help them. The law was barbarous, cruel and unjust. I had been in a concentration camp, and I knew what suffering was. If I can ease suffering, I feel perfectly justified in doing so.

-Dr. Henry Morgentaler, a Canadian doctor who was arrested four times for performing abortions, but whose arrests eventually led to the 1988 Canadian Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in the country.

He died this week at the age of 90. Good obit in the NY Times.

Image from Vancouver Sun.

Share This Article

I posted a couple things here about Wendy Davis’ insanely awesome marathon filibuster to stop SB5, which is a bill from Texas that would close the majority of the clinics in the state that not only provide abortion services, but contraception and general health care.  And she wasn’t alone.  Hundreds of local supporters stood by her and when the bill was thought to be stopped, the capitol building erupted with cheers.

The lawmakers had to vote on this bill before it hit midnight.  But thanks to Senator Wendy Davis, Senator Leticia Van De Putte, and hundreds of reproductive justice advocates, lawmakers fortunately did not get the chance to meet that deadline. Republican lawmakers tried to argue that the bill was voted and passed on time despite clear evidence revealing that the vote ended on June 26 when it was supposed to be June 25.  They later took it back and admitted that the vote occurred after midnight and the bill was dead.  All Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst could say about it was: “…it’s been fun.”  Because taking away people’s rights to health care is so much fun.

The bill was thought to be stopped and everyone in the social justice club was happy.  But Texas Governor Rick Perry called for a special session to try to bring SB5 back.  This would make all the efforts of the Texans who went to stop this in vain.  Governor Rick Perry’s Facebook, Twitter, office website, office address, and phone information has been spreading so that people can voice their opinions.  Hopefully the voices of the constituents will be heard.

While the Internet social justice atmosphere exploded at the news of Texan Republicans’ shady tactics, for good reason, Ohio has passed some terrible anti-choice legislation of their own.  Ohio lawmakers didn’t even bring it up for debate.  They slyly passed the bill last minute the other night.  Activists are sharing Ohio Governor John Kaisch’s phone number (614-728-7576) in hopes that he line-vetoes the measure.  If he doesn’t, Planned Parenthood and rape crisis centers lose their funding in that state, and those funds will be going to Crisis Pregnancy Centers.  And you know what Crisis Pregnancy Centers are like.  People will have to will 24 hours before receiving their emergency contraception.  Forced ultrasounds will be legalized, and the unwilling patient would still have to pay for it.  This measure would even redefine pregnancy, throwing out the actual medical definition, so that using emergency contraception would be considered abortion.

We have our work cut out for us.

Share This Article

The discrimination that Nepalese women face are from the patriarchal attitude of our society. Nepalese women face discrimination in every aspect of development like education, employment, priority, etc. Talking about the gender discrimination reproductive health of Nepalese women is one of the major neglected area. The discrimination that Nepalese women face in regards to reproductive health is found at every stage from the decision on when to become pregnant, to decide the number of children, to decide about whether or not to deliver the child. One of the most critical reproductive health issue in Nepal is abortion. Because of too many cultural barriers safe abortion is always been a challenge in Nepal. Despite of the fact that Nepal government support the safe abortion law still the government fails to repeal restrictive abortion and effective implementation of reproductive health program. Due to these difficulties Nepalese women are forced to resort to unsafe measures to terminate pregnancies such as inserting a cow-dug smeared stick into the vagina or inserting chemical dyes and thus an average of six women each year die as a result of botched illegal abortion.

Similarly the issue of abortion is again a major challenge in unmarried youth and is a hindrance to reproductive health care in Nepal. The negative attitude of health service providers in health centers regarding abortion of unmarried female leads to the involvement of high numbers of these population to unsafe and painful abortion, ultimately affecting the fertility and life of female. There has always been a conflict between the group supporting legal and safe abortion and those who are against infanticide. But there always arise a question that, is the life of one who is not even born in the world is more important then the one who is already born and has lived the years of their life. And again the question is, does the mother who is not accepting the baby from her soul can provide the baby with better quality of life.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

 

UPDATE: Governor Kasich signed the budget bill with all of the anti-choice provisions intact. The Governor has proven he is out of touch with Ohioans and his actions will hurt Ohio women and their families. 

Ohio Governor John Kasich touted his budget bill as “Jobs 2.0”. What the Ohio legislature turned it into is anything but. The “Jobs Budget” is now an anti-abortion bill filled with amendments that devastatingly restrict access and information from Ohioans at a time when it’s needed most. We know that timing is everything when it comes to reproductive and sexual healthcare.  Delaying access to healthcare services does nothing to make an unintended pregnancy or STD disappear, and in fact only increases dire outcomes. Yet the majority of Ohio legislators would rather do just that.

The budget has been passed through the conference committee and is on its way to Gov. Kasich to be signed by the end of the week. If signed as is, here’s what the amendments will do:

  1. Essentially defund family planning clinics, including Planned Parenthood clinics, through a funding system that is no longer competitive.
  2. Divert scarce TANF dollars to fake “crisis pregnancy center” that lie to women and provide no medical or health care.
  3. Prohibit public hospitals from entering into transfer agreements with clinics that provide abortions which will ultimately shut down many clinics in Ohio.
  4. And in an eleventh hour move, require unnecessary ultrasounds to detect a fetal heartbeat before an abortion is performed.

Now don’t think for a second that Ohio legislators are so brilliant that they came up with these ideas on their own.  We are seeing destructive bills like this across the country. Ohio’s only hope now is that Governor Kasich, who is seeking reelection in 2014, line-item veto these amendments.  It’s a long shot, but the only shot we have.

Call Governor Kasich today at (614) 328-9435! Tell him to remove these amendments that restrict access to vital (and legal) healthcare services!

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

From Huffington Post:

The Texas anti-abortion bill, which threatened to close nearly all of the abortion clinics in the state and prompted an 11-hour filibuster by state Sen. Wendy Davis (D), is dead, The Austin American-Statesman reported.

Lawmakers had to vote on Senate Bill 5 before the special session’s end at 12 a.m. local time. However, more than 400 protesters halted the proceedings 15 minutes before the roll call could be completed with what they called “a people’s filibuster,”The Associated Press reported.

The crowd of demonstrators in the capitol cried “Shame! Shame!” when Davis’ filibuster was halted by Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, who ruled that her discussion of mandatory ultrasound testing was off-topic. Then the protesters roared after state Sen. Leticia Van De Putte asked, “At what point must a female senator raise her hand or her voice to be recognized over her male colleagues?”

Their cries continued to echo inside the chamber — and over a livestream watched by thousands around the world — until after the midnight deadline passed.

Although some Republican lawmakers later claimed the bill had passed in time, Democrats denied that the vote was completed before the clock ran out on the session.

A time stamp showing the vote completed after midnight was the deciding factor. “This will not become law,” Sen. John Whitmire (D), told The Austin American-Statesman.

In response, the crowd of protesters gathered in the capitol cheered and began singing “The Eyes Of Texas,” the alma mater of the University of Texas at Austin.

According to The Texas Tribune, Dewhurst was less than pleased by the evening’s turn of events. After ruling that the time on SB 5 had expired, he told reporters that “an unruly mob using Occupy Wall Street tactics” had derailed legislation that was designed to protect women and babies.

The legislation would have prohibited abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, regulated first-trimester abortion clinics as ambulatory surgical centers and restricted access to medication abortions. Had it passed, nearly all of the clinics in the state would have been shuttered.

Dewhurst also hinted that Gov. Rick Perry may call another special session to get the bill passed, saying: “It’s over. It’s been fun. But see you soon.”

Despite a long day of filibustering, Davis was upbeat when she greeted the crowd of supporters, who applauded the senator and chanted her name.

“Today was democracy in action,” Davis said. “You all are the voices we were speaking for from the floor.”

Share This Article

Today, you are our heroes.

You stared down a bullying legislature that had repeatedly shown it would stop at nothing to pass a sweeping abortion restriction bill that would endanger millions of women’s health and lives.

And you didn’t flinch.

Senator Davis, your filibuster was among the most courageous acts  we have ever seen by a legislator. Following the rules of the Senate, you stood for over 11 hours, with no food or drink,  barred even from leaning, and shared women’s real stories of their experiences with abortion – stories that had previously been ruled “too repetitive” by the legislature.

After 2 trumped-up warnings, they finally shut you down after 11 hours on false charges of going off topic.

And then the people took over.

The hundreds of activists who had filled the chamber for days would not be silenced.  From all over the state, you had been watching since Thursday as Republicans attempted to ramrod SB-5 through the special session.

Your cheers and shouts delayed the session, and the bill was unable to pass before midnight.

Thank you, Senator Davis and the People’s Filibuster , for your courage and your leadership.  You showed that the people of Texas won’t stand for attacks on women’s health.  Today, you inspire us to keep fighting.    You weren’t silenced and we won’t be either.

To the women of Texas and to the 1 in 3 women who will need an abortion in her lifetime:  we’ve got your back!

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

From Tumblr blogger kat1712:
(edited for language)

Senator Wendy Davis is a f*cking badass.

There’s this bill that they are trying to pass in Texas that would make it illegal to get any abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy, and would make it very difficult for abortion centers to continue doing what they do. Governor Rick Perry has already said that if the bill makes it to his desk, he will sign it. And Wendy Davis said f*ck no that is not happening.

So she’s filibustering it. That means she asked to talk on the subject at 11:18 this morning, and if she can continue talking about abortion until 11:59 tonight, the bill won’t reach Governor Perry, and they would have to start all over with the bill next time they meet- 2 years from now.

But Wendy has to keep talking. She can’t pause for even a minute, not for food or a sip of water or to go to the bathroom or sit down. She can’t even lean up against anything, or she’s out. So she’s wearing motherf*cking PINK NIKE TENNIS SHOES in the middle of the state senate.

She also has to continue talking about the topic. She sent out tweets an other messages last night asking for anyone and everyone’s abortion story, and received a sh*t load of answers. Her staff is still collecting them, and she’s reading them aloud to the senate. Not only is she making this bill impossible to pass, she may just change some minds while she’s at it.

This is history, guys. Wendy Davis is a motherf*cking badass, and we are watching it happen.

Dallas Live Video

CBS NEWS: Senator Wendy Davis

Twitter Results for Wendy Davis

Share This Article

This weekend in Texas, hundreds of protestors packed into the Texas State House Capitol to protest SB-5, an omnibus anti-choice bill that would shut down all but five abortion clinics in the state, ban abortions after 20 weeks, and make medical abortions all but impossible to prescribe or obtain legally.

The Texas legislature insulted and then ignored them.

House Affairs Committee Chairman Byron Cook barred hundreds of women from sharing their real experiences, saying the public testimony was becoming “repetitive.” In the course of forcing this bill through, the legislature suspended rules, restricted testimony, and now Senator David Dewhurst is trying to do the same tonight.

Join protestors at the State House in Austin now. Or call your Senator RIGHT NOW, share your story, and tell them to vote AGAINST SB-5. (512) 402-8385

The bill still has to get through the Senate, and Democrats have promised a filibuster. There’s still time to stop this bill in the next 24 hours.

1 in 3 women will have an abortion in her lifetime. Limiting access hurts all Texans. Call your State Senator at (512) 402-8385 and speak out against SB-5 right now.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

For decades, most Crisis Pregnancy Centers have been lying to women, evading questions, and disguising their institutions as health care facilities. They receive federal funding to shame women into believing lies- “abortion causes breast cancer”, “it will make you infertile”, “condoms do not protect against STIs”, etc. They do not have a doctor at these facilities, and are not under HIPAA regulations of non-disclosure of medical records. They are against all contraception forms. They will harass a woman until she is in tears, and then send her on her way with a Christian religious token, and a promise from her that she will keep her child, they will only provide “help” if she agrees to go to Bible Study. This is not health care. Title X funding should be revoked.

LINK: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/cut-funding-crisis-pregnancy-centers/x44cgD3v

Share This Article

“CPCs have a long history of engaging in deceptive advertising. For example, some CPCs intentionally choose their name to mislead women into believing that they offer a wide range of services, including family planning and abortion care. The Family Research Council investigated what names would be most likely to appeal to women, particularly pro-choice women, in a 1998 report. Women’s Resource Center, which gives the impression of a full range of services, was deemed to have the most strategic value in reaching women “at risk for abortion.” The report also showed that women faced with an unplanned pregnancy were most likely to look in the Yellow Pages under the words “Pregnancy,” “Medical,” “Women’s Centers” and “Clinics.” Accordingly, CPCs often are advertised under these categories, as well as “Abortion Alternatives,” and “Women’s Organizations.” CPCs also advertise through posters, signs, and billboards that contain messages like, “Free Pregnancy Test,” or “Pregnant? Scared? We Can Help! Call 1-800 #.” Women report, however, that when they call these numbers the CPC representatives evade questions about whether they provide abortions, and urge the women to make an appointment to meet with a ‘counselor’ to talk in person.”

Crisis Pregnancy Centers: An Affront to Choice

Share This Article

BREAKING:  Lawmakers have solved all of the United States’ problems through legislation.   Now they have time to devote to dangerous, blatantly unconstitutional bills that they know have no chance of becoming law!

That’s what you’d think is going on anyway.  Congress yesterday passed a nationwide ban on abortion after 20 weeks.

They know that Roe v. Wade ensures women the right to an abortion to the point of viability, without a specified time limit.

They know that just a month ago a federal court struck down Arizona’s 20-week ban.

And they know that this bill is doomed to fail in the Senate.

But since they were bored (I guess?), they went ahead with it anyway.

Anti-abortion activists brought their usual common sense and intellectual rigor to the debate, with the bill’s sponsor Trent Franks arguing against allowing an exception for rape and incest on the grounds that that doesn’t happen; and with Michael Burgess (R-Texas) claiming that abortion is wrong because male fetuses masturbate.

Meanwhile, within a few hours, a thousand of you signed a petition urging Congress to drop the bill.    Many of you observed in comments that the bill was unconstitutional.  Others mentioned the danger barriers to access pose to women.  Some called the bill “using women’s bodies to further a political agenda,”  “an embarrassment,” “a waste of time and money,” and “a violation of women’s rights.”

Congress replied,

funny-pictures-beaver-cant-hear-you

 

Here’s a short list of the stuff Congress totes fixed before they took up the 20-week ban:   

- LGBT discrimination

- Sexual assault in the military and on college campuses

- Deadly gun violence

- A little thing called The Economy.

….Wait no.  I meant:  A short list of things they still haven’t managed to fix, which still cry out for their attention, which are receiving widespread media attention and which millions of Americans care about.  That kind of stuff.  I guess they’ll work on it when they have time.

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article
images

Lisa Hanna, Jamaica’s minister with responsibility for youth, has suggested that the time has come for the country to review the legality of abortion.

In making her contribution to the Sectoral Debate in the House of Representatives today, Hanna said the law which prohibits abortion is outdated and debate on changing the legislation has been ongoing for the past 38 years.

She told parliamentarians that Jamaica needs to face the reality that many persons having children are themselves children with no parenting skills.

I have been saying this ever since i was a teenager, we need a review of the abortion laws not only because children are the ones that are having children but because there are so many young girls whose lives are ruined by rape and being forced to carry the child or by just carelessness and i think everyone deserves a second chance so why shouldn’t these teenagers who made one mistake or whose innocence was taken away by some sex crazed beast be given the chance to correct there mistake and try to make a future?

Minister Hanna also told parliamentarians that Jamaica needs to face the reality that many persons having children are themselves children with no parenting skills.

Meanwhile Hanna said neglect by parents and guardians is the number one form of abuse recorded by the Office of the Children’s Registry.

She noted that a United States study found that there was a direct correlation between crime and unwanted children.

She also said the landmark ROE vs WADE court case changed the direction of women’s rights.

for more on this release see the link below:

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/latest/article.php?id=45828

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

977956_10151240610257706_1754366439_o

On Tuesday, over 100 activists gathered together in DC\’s Dupont Circle to honor Beatriz and all women who have experienced abortion at a vigil hosted by Advocates for Youth, IpasReligious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC), and The National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health.

The vigil began with a prayer from the Rev. Harry Knox, President and CEO of RCRC.  “We are comforted in knowing that justice was finally accomplished and that the life of this blessed woman was spared. We give thanks that you see Beatriz, and other women in similar circumstances, not just in El Salvador but around the world.”

Debra Hauser, President of Advocates for Youth, then shared remarks.

“For months Beatriz was denied the care that could save her life.  Her story is her own but it is also ours.  We are Beatriz.  We are also the teen in Jackson, Miss., forced to obtain permission from an abusive parent who denies it; the middle-aged mother in El Paso, Tex., with so few resources she can’t scrape together enough money to end her pregnancy but can\’t fathom how she can possibly support another child; the couple in Salt Lake City, Utah, forced to endure a barrage of falsehoods about the \”side-effects” of abortion and made to wait three days in a roadside motel before being permitted to return to the clinic for the procedure; the young girl in Lancaster, PA afraid to tell her parents she is pregnant and who instead gives birth in a high school bathroom. We are 1 in 3.\”

Readers stepped forward to share women\’s real stories of abortion from the 1 in 3 Campaign.  Each story was different, and each was important to understanding women\’s real experiences with abortion.

The vigil closed with remarks from Jessica Gonzales-Rojas, ED, National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health.  Jessica reminded people of the deadly cost of policies like the Hyde amendment and the El Salvador restrictions.

Although anti-abortion protestors attempted to disrupt the vigil, activists stood together in solidarity for Beatriz and women like her.  We are 1 in 3!

Watch video of the vigil (program begins at minute 6:30)

Read the Huffington Post editorial by leaders of the vigil

Check out pics of the event

Categories: Abortion
Share This Article

A dangerous development in Myanmar is largely going unreported. Recently, local authorities announced their support for the enforcement of a two-child limit for Rohingya Muslims. While not an official policy of the central or state government, the policy has been implemented on a grass-roots level. The most recent public endorsement for this policy comes from Immigration Minister, Khin Yi who stated that Rohingya families of 10-12 children are “not good for child nutrition. It’s not very easy for schooling. It is not very easy to take care of the children.” While details of this discriminatory practice are recently reaching the international community, some believe this policy has been in effect for years, possibly decades.

This stateless, minority group primarily lives in one of Southeast Asia’s poorest regions, Rakhine state. They have been excluded from Myanmar’s 1982 Citizenship Act which recognizes 135 ethnic groups. Bangladesh has also disowned the Rohingyas and denied them refugee status, although they migrated from Bangladesh between 1824 and 1948. The two-child policy is aimed at controlling unrest between Buddhists (the majority in Myanmar) and Muslims. As a result of increasing violence, stricter policies have been placed on the Rohingyas, risking the spread of wider anti-Muslim sentiment. More worrisome is the belief that the child restriction is a form of ethnic cleansing.

Health experts fear this policy could encourage unsafe abortions in Myanmar, where abortion is illegal except in cases of maternal life.[1] Women that already have two children who become pregnant might have an illegal abortion in order to avoid fines or incarceration. Vickie Hawkins, Deputy Head of Mission of Myanmar’s Doctors Without Borders divisionv often sees “Women coming in [the] clinics with infections and medical complications because they have had unsafe abortions”. Doctors Without Borders operate in Maungdaw and Buthidaung townships where there are the largest Rohingya populations in the state. Journalists are not allowed to visit either town, making it difficult to access correct information and rally the international community behind this issue.

The UN and other human right organizations have condemned Myanmar’s unofficial policy, arguing it violates international law and harms women’s mental and physical health. While family planning is an issue that should involve both parents, this policy attacks women’s autonomy over their bodies. In addition, this ban circumscribes the construction of Myanmar Buddhist families onto the Rohingya population. Forcing cultural and ethnic norms onto groups has never worked and will only intensify the animosity between Myanmar’s populations.

 

Source: Reuter’s. “Myanmar Minister backs 2-child Policy for Rohingyas”